First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 65785
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Fonts Team <fonts@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: tklauser@nuerscht.ch
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
sgi-fonts-1.0.ebuild Ebuild for sgi-fonts-1.0 text/plain tklauser@nuerscht.ch 2004-09-29 02:11 0000 1.27 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 65785 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 65785 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-09-29 02:11 0000 
I always missed my favourite typewriter font (SGI screen) as an ebuild in
portge, so here it is. I couldn't find the fonts on the SGI homepage (maybe
they're in the SGI ProPack

------- Comment #1 From tklauser@nuerscht.ch 2004-09-29 02:11:12 0000 ------- 
I always missed my favourite typewriter font (SGI screen) as an ebuild in
portge, so here it is. I couldn't find the fonts on the SGI homepage (maybe
they're in the SGI ProPackĀ™ 3 for Linux), but SuSE provides an RPM containing
only the fonts. The license on
http://www.suse.com/us/private/products/suse_linux/prof/packages_professional/sgi-fonts.html
says "X11/MIT" so I think we can use it.

Category: media-fonts of course

I really hope to see this awesome fonts in portage.

------- Comment #2 From tklauser@nuerscht.ch 2004-09-29 02:11:46 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=40690) [edit]
Ebuild for sgi-fonts-1.0

As described above.

------- Comment #3 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2004-10-01 11:55:16 0000 ------- 
Thanks for the contribution. Added to CVS. Cool font, i like it ;-)

------- Comment #4 From Stefan Schweizer 2004-10-01 23:10:20 0000 ------- 
inherit rpm

rpm_src_unpack


I always think we should use a faster method  if it is possible ..

------- Comment #5 From tklauser@nuerscht.ch 2004-10-02 00:36:46 0000 ------- 
Cool. I didn't know about the rpm eclass. Thanks for the advice.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug