First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 65418
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Crypto team <crypto@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Emilio Pavia <emix@solira.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
scsign-0.0.2.ebuild scsign-0.0.2.ebuild text/plain Emilio Pavia 2004-09-26 09:31 0000 439 bytes Details
scsign-0.0.4.ebuild scsign-0.0.4.ebuild text/plain Daniel Black 2004-12-15 22:52 0000 604 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 65418 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 65418 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-09-26 09:30 0000 
Scsign is a small command-line utility to digitally sign a file.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Emilio Pavia 2004-09-26 09:31:42 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=40459) [details]
scsign-0.0.2.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Daniel Black 2004-12-15 22:52:07 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=46103) [details]
scsign-0.0.4.ebuild

Get an error with the latest version: Care to solve?

scsign.c: In function `p15getlistcert':
scsign.c:645: error: invalid use of void expression

Portage 2.0.51-r8 (default-linux/x86/2004.3, gcc-3.4.3,
glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1, 2.6.8-gentoo-r10 i686)

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Black 2005-01-01 19:29:10 0000 ------- 
Please reopen when the error can be fixed.

------- Comment #4 From Emilio Pavia 2005-01-02 01:04:03 0000 ------- 
I've no error compiling 0.0.4 version. I think it depends on gcc-3.4.x. I'll
submit this bug to the developer.

My system is:
Portage 2.0.51-r3 (default-linux/x86/2004.2, gcc-3.3.4,
glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1, 2.6.9-mm1 i686)

------- Comment #5 From Daniel Black 2005-01-02 01:52:19 0000 ------- 
was a coding fault as per URL.

0.0.4 added.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug