First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 61308
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Sound Team <sound@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
jamin-0.9.0-geq.patch-21269.out as requested by the ebuild text/plain Mark Knecht 2004-08-22 16:51 0000 2.47 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 61308 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 61308 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-08-22 16:47 0000
New jamin 0.9.0-r1 ebuild failed during normal update today.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge ~x86 version of Jamin

Actual Results:  
>>> emerge (5 of 11) media-sound/jamin-0.9.0-r1 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) jamin-0.9.0.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking jamin-0.9.0.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/jamin-0.9.0-r1/work
 * Applying jamin-0.9.0-scenes.patch...                                   [ ok ]
 * Applying jamin-0.9.0-geq.patch...

 * Failed Patch: jamin-0.9.0-geq.patch!
 * 
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 * 
 *   /var/tmp/portage/jamin-0.9.0-r1/temp/jamin-0.9.0-geq.patch-21269.out


!!! ERROR: media-sound/jamin-0.9.0-r1 failed.
!!! Function epatch, Line 331, Exitcode 0
!!! Failed Patch: jamin-0.9.0-geq.patch!

root@flash ~ # 


Expected Results:  
Should find patch and build?

root@flash ~ # emerge info
Portage 2.0.50-r9 (default-x86-2004.0, gcc-3.3.3, glibc-2.3.3.20040420-r1, 2.6.6)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.6.6 i686 Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4     CPU 3.06GHz
Gentoo Base System version 1.5.2
Autoconf: sys-devel/autoconf-2.59-r4
Automake: sys-devel/automake-1.8.3
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
CFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3.2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref
/usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/
/usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d"
CXXFLAGS="-O2 -march=pentium4 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
FEATURES="autoaddcvs ccache sandbox"
GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://mirror.tucdemonic.org/gentoo/
ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo http://mirror.gentoo.gr.jp
http://www.zentek-international.com/mirrors/gentoo/"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
USE="X aalib alsa apm avi berkdb cdr crypt cups dvd dvdr encode esd fluidsynth
foomaticdb gdbm gif gimp gimpprint gphoto2 gpm gtk gtk2 guile imlib jack
jack-tmpfs java jpeg libg++ libwww mad mikmod mmx motif mozcalendar mozilla mpeg
ncurses nls oggvorbis opengl oss pam pdflib perl png ppds python qt quicktime
readline sdl slang spell sse ssl svga tcltk tcpd tetex truetype usb
video_cards_radeon x86 xml2 xmms xv zlib"

root@flash ~ #

------- Comment #1 From Mark Knecht 2004-08-22 16:51:54 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=37979) [details]
as requested by the ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Frank van de Pol (RETIRED) 2004-08-23 08:06:42 0000 -------
Thanks for spotting this Mark. It's now fixed in portage cvs. 

This defect was caused since the patch did contain some context which happend to be a CVS $Id: tag. During checking to the Gentoo CVS this $Id was changed to mine, which causes patch to fail against the original code.

(I hope this execuse is lame enough for not having to wear a brown paper bag whole dat :-)

------- Comment #3 From Mark Knecht 2004-08-23 10:47:21 0000 -------
Thanks Frank. Seems fine now.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug