Bug 591088 – =dev-python/lxml-3.6.0 stabilization request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Zac Medico 2016-08-12 05:38:43 UTC]

Please stabilize, since this is needed for app-portage/repoman-2.3.0-r1.

[Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2016-08-13 11:33:44 UTC]

Stable for HPPA PPC64.

[Comment 2 Markus Meier 2016-08-14 19:24:37 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 3 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2016-09-04 10:30:13 UTC]

This fails tests on alpha and amd64. (see bug 592860)

[Comment 4 Zac Medico 2016-09-04 14:38:52 UTC]

(In reply to Tobias Klausmann from comment #3)
> This fails tests on alpha and amd64. (see bug 592860)

I see the same test failure on amd64 for lxml-3.5.0 (current stable), so it does not appear to be a regression.

[Comment 5 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2016-09-05 10:14:05 UTC]

I stabilized lxml 3.6.0 on Alpha.

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-10-14 10:33:59 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2016-10-15 09:47:41 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 8 Richard Freeman 2016-10-17 11:30:34 UTC]

This package-version does not appear to be in the tree (causing a reversion on amd64/x86).  It seems like the new revision should be stabilized, or this version should be re-introduced?

[Comment 9 Zac Medico 2016-10-17 16:39:44 UTC]

I can still see lxml-3.6.0.ebuild here:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/dev-python/lxml

The last commit in this directory added an x86 keyword to the same ebuild:

https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=9fae0fe723c69269fd7918824916082e76d64fe6

[Comment 10 Richard Freeman 2016-10-17 16:40:57 UTC]

(In reply to Richard Freeman from comment #8)
> This package-version does not appear to be in the tree (causing a reversion
> on amd64/x86).  It seems like the new revision should be stabilized, or this
> version should be re-introduced?

Disregard.  I mixed this up with a 3.6.4 bump.

[Comment 11 SpanKY 2016-11-12 04:29:55 UTC]

done the rest