First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 57275
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: TEST-REQUEST
Assigned To: Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) <gustavoz@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Steven Green <steven@greenius.co.uk>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
spamass-milter-0.2.0-r1.ebuild mail-filter/spamass-milter upgrade to CVS version text/plain Steven Green 2004-07-16 04:11 0000 1.20 KB Details
spamass-milter-0.3.0.ebuild mail-filter/spamass-milter 0.3.0 ebuild application/octet-stream Steven Green 2005-02-08 12:04 0000 1.05 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 57275 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 57275 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-07-16 04:07 0000
The release version of spamass-milter 0.2.0 is over a year old, and there are
some serious bugs that have been fixed.  I have been following the
spamass-milter mailing list and most people seem to think the CVS version is
more stable, but I don't see manby signs of the author making an official
release any time soon, so put together this ebuild that checks the code out of
CVS.

It makes use of the existing files in
/usr/portage/mail-filter/spamass-milter/files, in particular the conf.rc and
init.d files.

This is my first attempt at making an ebuild, so may have mistakes.  I started
with the existing ebuild (spamass-milter-0.2.0.ebuild), made it inherit cvs and
set up the appropriate ECVS variables.  I couldn't get the RSA host key check
to work, so have commented that out for now.  I added code to the compile()
function to run the various autoconf commands needed to make the configure
script.

I wasn't sure what version to give it.  The CVS version identifies itself as
0.2.0+cvs, but that doesn't really fit in with the gentoo versioning, went for
0.2.0-p1, it might be better to make it 0.2.1-rc1 or something instead.

I have only tested it on my own system, x86.

------- Comment #1 From Steven Green 2004-07-16 04:11:00 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=35539) [edit]
mail-filter/spamass-milter upgrade to CVS version

------- Comment #2 From Steven Green 2004-07-16 04:19:51 0000 -------
See also http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23136

------- Comment #3 From Darren Spruell 2004-07-26 14:31:46 0000 -------
We currently use spamass-milter-0.2.0 on a mail gateway. Every so often we stop
receiving mail and get a lot of these lines in our logs: "Milter
(spamassassin): error connecting to filter: Connection refused by
/var/run/spamass-milter.sock"

A fix for this would be nice. There are also several "other" errors that we're
attributing to the unstability of this version.

What's the likelyhood of getting this ebuild into Portage, at least as a
~keyword?

------- Comment #4 From Steph L 2005-02-08 06:37:21 0000 -------
Better update the ebuild to version 0.3.0 just released :
http://savannah.nongnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=3595

------- Comment #5 From Steven Green 2005-02-08 12:04:51 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=50772) [edit]
mail-filter/spamass-milter 0.3.0 ebuild

I have attached an ebuild for 0.3.0.	It is the same as the old 0.2.0 ebuild,
but renamed and with the text for the readme changed to us ${PF} instead of
hard coded path.

It seems to be running fine on a machine here (x86), but not had time for any
thorough testing.

------- Comment #6 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-02-09 09:33:10 0000 -------
I'm taking over the spamass-milter maintainership in gentoo.
Ebuild soon, stay tuned.

------- Comment #7 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-02-09 10:34:58 0000 -------
spamass-milter-0.3.0 in portage with KEYWORDS ~x86 ~sparc.
Please test and report back, basic testing for me is sane with SA 3.0.2-r1.
I'll probably make -r1 in a couple of days with revamped initscripts for dropped privs.

------- Comment #8 From Burdeiny Michael 2005-10-13 04:16:45 0000 -------
I tested 0.3.0 version on amd64. It works fine :)

------- Comment #9 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-10-13 06:39:01 0000 -------
Applied ~amd64 KEYWORDS, thanks for the report.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug