First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 56597
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo net-p2p team <net-p2p@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Leonid Podolny <leonidp.lists@gmail.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
mldonkey Build log text/plain Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:04 0000 54.07 KB Details
info Portage info text/plain Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:05 0000 2.00 KB Details
list List of the installed ebuilds text/plain Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:06 0000 9.61 KB Details
21buildlog 2.5.21 build log application/octet-stream Leonid Podolny 2004-07-11 05:06 0000 40.72 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 56597 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 56597 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-07-10 05:01 0000
When I try to emerge net-p2p/mldonkey-2.5.16-r4, the emerge fails. See
attachment for the full build log.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:04:01 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=35106) [edit]
Build log

------- Comment #2 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:05:29 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=35107) [edit]
Portage info

------- Comment #3 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 05:06:19 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=35108) [edit]
List of the installed ebuilds

------- Comment #4 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-10 23:12:18 0000 -------
2 things- when you upgraded to ocaml 3.07, did you run the rebuild script
included with the update? Could you also please try the latest mldonkey-2.5.16
revision in portage?

------- Comment #5 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-10 23:51:41 0000 -------
1) rebuild script -- yes, I did. It showed that it has nothing to do, which is
odd, because I have mldonkey installed.
I'll check another revision in an hour or so. However, it's a last ebuild
marked stable, so it'll ask me to downgrade afterwards.

------- Comment #6 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-11 05:03:40 0000 -------
The last 2.4.16-r7 fails with exactly the same error. 2.4.21-r2 is fails with
another error, which I attach as a new error log.

------- Comment #7 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-11 05:06:58 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=35172) [edit]
2.5.21 build log

------- Comment #8 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-11 05:07:36 0000 -------
I meant 2.5.16 and 2.5.21, of course.

------- Comment #9 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-16 02:37:16 0000 -------
Some kind soul advised me to re-emerge liblgtk and liblgl. liblgtk failed to
remerge with exactly the same error as mldonkey. liblgl emerged flawlessly, and
then i emerge both liblgtk and mldonkey without any problem. Should I close
this bug or you would rather further investigate on this issue? 

------- Comment #10 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-19 15:34:15 0000 -------
I'd like to investigate further on why lablgl needed to be remerged.
mattam- I seemed to get this bug report after the ocaml upgrade- I wasn't sure if you knew of something that might be causing this?

------- Comment #11 From Matthieu Sozeau (RETIRED) 2004-07-19 16:11:01 0000 -------
Lablgl needs to be reemerged (like any other caml library) on compiler updates,
because caml is not binary compatible from version to version. The problem here
is that the rebuilding script did not catch lablgl, which i find bizarre. The
fact that lablgtk failed to rebuild without first upgrading to lablgl is
another instance of the binary incompatibility problem.
Could you try 'reverting' to the moment when you got the compiler merged and
investigate by putting some debug echo's in my rebuild script, or just give us
the output of `qpkg -nc -n -q -I dev-lang/ocaml-3.06` in this configuration ?
I have really no idea of the source of the problem...

------- Comment #12 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-20 02:03:38 0000 -------
Matthieu,
Tell me exactly what to do. You want me to downgrade to the previous version of mldonkey and that's it? Or do I need to downgrade the gcc then downgrade mldonkey?

------- Comment #13 From Matthieu Sozeau (RETIRED) 2004-07-20 02:22:02 0000 -------
I meant when you got the ocaml 3.07 compiler merged. Thinking twice, you may
not be able to do so (you'll need to rebuild 3.06, lablgl etc... and 3.07
again), but you can attach your emerge.log so that i can try to reproduce your
installation myself.

------- Comment #14 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-20 17:40:14 0000 -------
*** Bug 57696 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #15 From Leonid Podolny 2004-07-20 23:52:09 0000 -------
Matthieu,
I've attached the emerge.log for mldonkey at the very beginning. Please, let me know what do you want me to provide.

------- Comment #16 From Matthieu Sozeau (RETIRED) 2004-07-21 10:17:23 0000 -------
Ok, i've been able to reproduce the problem on another machine and i tracked
down the problem. It is my rebuild script that expected a particular output
from qpkg which it didn't get (it has changed between versions). Now the script
find lablgl and lablgtk as expected (but not mldonkey, i don't know why) and
should be more robust regarding qpkg changes.

------- Comment #17 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-30 11:57:38 0000 -------
*** Bug 58309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #18 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-07-30 18:50:04 0000 -------
*** Bug 58938 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #19 From David Warde-Farley 2004-08-01 14:52:45 0000 -------
The fixed described here (re-merge lablgl and lablgtk) works fine, but this
wasn't drawn to my attention upon upgrading ocaml. should it have been?

------- Comment #20 From Matthieu Sozeau (RETIRED) 2004-08-01 15:09:05 0000 -------
The ocaml upgrade should have informed you about the rebuild script which I
fixed one week ago so that it properly reemerges lablgl and lablgtk.

------- Comment #21 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-08-02 10:50:58 0000 -------
*** Bug 59142 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #22 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-08-05 14:27:23 0000 -------
*** Bug 59522 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #23 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-08-18 14:01:26 0000 -------
*** Bug 60817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #24 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-08-21 08:17:15 0000 -------
*** Bug 61081 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #25 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-08-22 17:43:36 0000 -------
*** Bug 61228 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #26 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-12-01 10:49:54 0000 -------
*** Bug 68135 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #27 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-12-01 10:52:35 0000 -------
*** Bug 65338 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #28 From Stian Skjelstad 2004-12-02 05:19:19 0000 -------
rebulding dev-ml/lablgtk solved the problem for me, but yes... that's ugly, so
this bug can't me marked as FIXED since there are still affected users with no
clues. Perhaps bump up the dev-ml/lablgtk version number to make it rebuild for
all users?

------- Comment #29 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-12-02 11:27:44 0000 -------
It's resolved. The ocaml bump should have told you to run the ocaml update
script:
sh /usr/portage/dev-lang/ocaml/files/ocaml-rebuild.sh

I wish ocaml could cause a post-compile dependency on the ocaml programs you
have installed. Sadly, it does not. Unless you can think of a better solution,
the rebuild script is the best we have.

------- Comment #30 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2004-12-04 09:25:57 0000 -------
*** Bug 72910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #31 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2005-02-27 12:52:01 0000 -------
*** Bug 78004 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #32 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2006-05-19 22:15:06 0000 -------
*** Bug 133771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #33 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2006-06-01 08:35:40 0000 -------
*** Bug 134905 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #34 From Jon Hood (RETIRED) 2006-06-19 07:40:00 0000 -------
*** Bug 137212 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #35 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-08-05 11:13:37 0000 -------
*** Bug 142899 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #36 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-08-09 03:27:32 0000 -------
*** Bug 127837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug