We either need to restore 1.5.0 or rapid stabilize 1.5.0-r1. You're call. yellow spiped # git show f61846bdd529e18ddd7dc1278caf3bbbadda295d | grep 'a/net-misc/spiped' diff --git a/net-misc/spiped/spiped-1.5.0.ebuild b/net-misc/spiped/spiped-1.5.0.ebuild --- a/net-misc/spiped/spiped-1.5.0.ebuild yellow spiped # git show f61846bdd529e18ddd7dc1278caf3bbbadda295d | grep KEYWORDS -KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" yellow spiped # eshowkw Keywords for net-misc/spiped: | | u | | a a a n p r s | n | | l m r h i m m i p i s p | u s | r | p d a m p a 6 i o p c s 3 a x | s l | e | h 6 r 6 p 6 8 p s p 6 c 9 s r 8 | e o | p | a 4 m 4 a 4 k s 2 c 4 v 0 h c 6 | d t | o ---------+---------------------------------+-----+------- 1.5.0-r1 | o ~ o o o o o o o o o o o o o ~ | o 0 | gentoo Reproducible: Always
Don't feel bad, this has been happening often. floppym seems to think this was an old behavior even under cvs, but i've been hitting it a lot under git. floppym might be right, since i'm now using my new releng tool which builds a lot-o-binpkgs along with release medium and so maybe i'm just now hitting a problem that's always been there.
Sorry, silly mistake.
commit 3bb7717 (HEAD, master) Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> Date: Sun Oct 11 13:47:08 2015 +0000 net-misc/spiped: Stable for amd64. Fixes bug 562826. Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> x86 folks, could you please stabilise this package on this arch? Thank you.
(In reply to Patrice Clement from comment #3) > commit 3bb7717 (HEAD, master) > Author: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> > Date: Sun Oct 11 13:47:08 2015 +0000 > > net-misc/spiped: Stable for amd64. Fixes bug 562826. > > Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 > Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement <monsieurp@gentoo.org> > > x86 folks, could you please stabilise this package on this arch? Thank you. Patrice, you set KEYWORD=x86 in that commit. Anyhow I tested on my x86 hardware and even though I'm not part of the team, I think its okay. @x86 pretty routine stuff, but if you think we should revisit this, reopen the bug. Otherwise, we're done.