First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 55676
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: CLOSED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: ppc64 architecture team <ppc64@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Yuta SATOH (RETIRED) <nigoro@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 55676 depends on: 54807 Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 55676 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)





View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-06-30 06:38 0000 
x11-terms/mlterm-2.8.0_p1-r1 compiles and works on ppc64
I have verified that this package works for ppc64.
Please add the ~ppc64 KEYWORDS to x11-terms/mlterm-2.8.0_p1-r1.

my USE Flag is "gtk2 altivec ppc64 -gnome cjk jpeg gif png tiff truetype".

------- Comment #1 From Yuta SATOH (RETIRED) 2004-06-30 06:39:45 0000 ------- 
add deps on bug #54807

This package depends...
gtk+-1.2.10-r11 and imlib-1.9.14-r1

------- Comment #2 From Tom Gall 2004-07-15 20:50:31 0000 ------- 
pulls in:

media-libs/gdk-pixbuf
gnome-base/gnome-libs
x app-text/docbook-sgml
x gnome-base/ORBit

------- Comment #3 From Tom Gall 2004-07-15 20:51:27 0000 ------- 
gnome-libs is failing on account of no libgmodule.so  and this appearantly
should be built by glib ...

------- Comment #4 From Yuta SATOH (RETIRED) 2004-07-15 21:43:47 0000 ------- 
Tom!
Thank you for processing many bugs.

I think that the problem is related to bug #56615 .
Because, .so files was not created when compiling glib after deleting the Symbolic Link of /lib/ld.so.1 .

Please recompile glib-1.2.10-r5 after checking that a file /lib/ld.so.1 exist.

------- Comment #5 From Tom Gall 2004-07-29 20:00:55 0000 ------- 
ahhh part of my cluelessness was that I didn't realize I needed both libgmodule
2.x and 1.x.  Makes quite a different!

Your assessment Yuta is quite right!  Thank you!

------- Comment #6 From Tom Gall 2004-07-29 20:11:38 0000 ------- 
Thanks Yuta, now marked stable

------- Comment #7 From Tom Gall 2004-07-29 20:12:15 0000 ------- 
stick a fork in it
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug