All, is it ok for this to go stable? I see that kmod-21 requires it, and it has been in the tree since Jan. Thanks, William
Commit message: Stabilize for all http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-devel/automake-wrapper/automake-wrapper-10.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
there's no need to round trip the wrapper the ebuild itself can be tested by arch testers, but it'll need to go through an atomic commit with the eclass. so people should just report whether it works here.
(In reply to SpanKY from comment #2) > there's no need to round trip the wrapper > > the ebuild itself can be tested by arch testers, but it'll need to go > through an atomic commit with the eclass. so people should just report > whether it works here. 1.15 is working on ppc and ppc64. I tested with the following toy autotools. make, make install, make uninstall, make distcheck worked fine. :::::::::::::: autogen.sh :::::::::::::: #!/bin/sh aclocal autoconf WANT_AUTOMAKE=1.15 automake --add-missing :::::::::::::: configure.ac :::::::::::::: AC_PREREQ([2.69]) AC_INIT([doit.c],[0.1]) AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign 1.15]) AC_PROG_CC AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile]) AC_OUTPUT :::::::::::::: doit.c :::::::::::::: int main(){return 0;} :::::::::::::: Makefile.am :::::::::::::: bin_PROGRAMS = doit doit_SOURCES = doit.c
Two test failures on both HPPA and PPC64: FAIL: t/dist-formats.tap 45 - ac=dist-zip,no-dist-gzip [distcheck] FAIL: t/instmany-python.sh The former doesn't fail on amd64. Otherwise, I guess HPPA and PPC64 are good.
(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #4) neither looks like regressions (there's open bugs about previous stable versions)
Created attachment 406354 [details] Tests on ppc64 (timberdoodle.gentoo.osuosl.org) @jer. How did you get those failures on ppc64? Running on timberdoodle they all passed.
Stable on alpha.
stabilized for all: http://sources.gentoo.org/sys-devel/automake/automake-1.15.ebuild?r1=1.2&r2=1.3 http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.176&r2=1.177
