First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 53859
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Science Related Packages <sci@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Uwe Schuerkamp <uwe@schuerkamp.de>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
xephem-3.6.ebuild xephem-3.6.ebuild text/plain Paul Taylor 2004-06-14 07:32 0000 1.85 KB Details
digest-xephem-3.6 digest-xephem-3.6 text/plain Paul Taylor 2004-06-14 07:33 0000 63 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 53859 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 53859 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-06-13 23:18 0000 
a new version has been released by E. Downey which compiles fine on Gentoo
within the same settings that 3.5.2 requires. Would be nice if some genooist
could update the ebuild for 3.6.0.


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Daniel Webert 2004-06-14 07:05:49 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 53891 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #2 From Paul Taylor 2004-06-14 07:32:42 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=33225) [edit]
xephem-3.6.ebuild

Quick-and-dirty modification of the existing xephem-3.5.2.ebuild.

------- Comment #3 From Paul Taylor 2004-06-14 07:33:40 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=33226) [edit]
digest-xephem-3.6

------- Comment #4 From Patrick Kursawe 2004-06-14 23:18:19 0000 ------- 
Thanks, guys. In CVS for ~x86.

------- Comment #5 From Uwe Schuerkamp 2004-06-14 23:21:56 0000 ------- 
just tried the attached ebuild, seems to work great! thanks uwe

------- Comment #6 From Danny van Dyk (RETIRED) 2004-06-15 09:59:27 0000 ------- 
Patrick: Why did you mark it only ~x86 ? 3.5.2 was marked "x86 ppc ~amd64" ! I
added "~ppc" and "~amd64" for the new version as well.

------- Comment #7 From Patrick Kursawe 2004-06-15 23:01:14 0000 ------- 
Oh, just because of our development policy. It should be keyworded for the
arches it is _know_ to work on. It is a different version (not just some
trivial patch), I could only test it for x86 so I marked it ~x86.
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug