Bug 532424 – app-misc/mc-4.8.13 stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Martin Bock 2014-12-13 10:19:04 UTC]

app-misc/mc-4.8.13 is without bugs in the tree since 2014-09-05. The package works here as aspected on amd64 since then.

[Comment 1 Ulenrich 2014-12-15 13:43:28 UTC]

Created attachment 391768 [details, diff]
please provide epatch_user

I found some fixes from Debian~unstable, but ebuild have epatch_user active

[Comment 2 Ulenrich 2014-12-15 13:47:19 UTC]

Created attachment 391770 [details, diff]
preventing data loss Debian patch

This patch applies and mc-4.8.13 runs well
but I cannot estimate how important this patch is.

[Comment 3 Ulenrich 2014-12-15 13:48:54 UTC]

Created attachment 391772 [details, diff]
preventing unintended execution

little nice and probably important Debian patch

[Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-12-15 13:53:23 UTC]

(In reply to Ulenrich from comment #3)
> Created attachment 391772 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> preventing unintended execution
> 
> little nice and probably important Debian patch

You're supposed to file a new bug report.

[Comment 5 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2014-12-15 22:26:03 UTC]

Arches, please stabilize for current targets:

    alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ppc ppc64 sparc x86

Thanks!

[Comment 6 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2014-12-15 22:38:51 UTC]

(In reply to Ulenrich from comment #3)
> Created attachment 391772 [details, diff] [details, diff]
> preventing unintended execution
> 
> little nice and probably important Debian patch

Done as mc-4.8.13-r1, but better create separate bug report next time.

> *mc-4.8.13-r1 (15 Dec 2014)
>
>  15 Dec 2014; Sergei Trofimovich <[e-mail]>
>  +files/mc-4.8.13-3297-prealloc.patch, +mc-4.8.13-r1.ebuild:
>  Add epatch_user and pull prealloc patch (bug #532424 by Ulenrich).

I've skipped the second patck as it's a bit scary.

Thanks!

[Comment 7 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-12-16 08:57:32 UTC]

OK, now what do we do?

[Comment 8 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2014-12-16 20:03:22 UTC]

(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #7)
> OK, now what do we do?

I'd suggest proceeding with stabilization for current targets:

    alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ppc ppc64 sparc x86

[Comment 9 Sergei Trofimovich (RETIRED) 2014-12-16 20:04:17 UTC]

> I'd suggest proceeding with stabilization for current targets:
> 
>     alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ppc ppc64 sparc x86

For '=app-misc/mc-4.8.13' (apologies, id hit enter too early).

[Comment 10 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-12-17 07:12:20 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 11 Markus Meier 2014-12-26 18:04:36 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-27 19:47:20 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-28 10:09:59 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-12-31 16:18:19 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 15 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-01-01 11:28:47 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 16 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-01-02 12:35:09 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 17 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-02-24 08:44:29 UTC]

alpha stable

[Comment 18 Agostino Sarubbo 2015-02-28 14:02:12 UTC]

ia64 stable. Closing.