Bug 529622 – =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.9: stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2014-11-17 12:44:26 UTC]

Please stabilize, thanks!

[Comment 1 Chema Alonso Josa (RETIRED) 2014-12-22 21:55:53 UTC]

emerge -1 =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 pulls unstable deps:

# required by app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5
# required by gpa (argument)
=app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.3 ~amd64

[Comment 2 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2014-12-22 22:00:14 UTC]

(In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #1)
> emerge -1 =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 pulls unstable deps:
> 
> # required by app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5
> # required by gpa (argument)
> =app-crypt/gpgme-1.5.3 ~amd64

right, let's stabilize it as well, opening.

[Comment 3 Chema Alonso Josa (RETIRED) 2014-12-25 17:00:53 UTC]

When running =app-crypt/gpa-0.9.5 a window appears with the following message:

"The GPGME library returned an unexpected error at keytable.c: 150. The error was:

  Unknown option

This is either an installation problem or a bug in GPA.
GPA will now try to recover from this error."

And the application hangs.

Anything I am doing wrong?

Thanks.

[Comment 4 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2014-12-25 23:23:24 UTC]

(In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3)
> Anything I am doing wrong?

No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1].

I will revert the stable of gpgme.

[1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795

[Comment 5 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2015-06-08 18:05:22 UTC]

(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4)
> (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3)
> > Anything I am doing wrong?
> 
> No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and
> send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1].
> 
> I will revert the stable of gpgme.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795

gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check?

[Comment 6 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2015-06-08 20:27:44 UTC]

(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5)
> (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3)
> > > Anything I am doing wrong?
> > 
> > No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and
> > send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1].
> > 
> > I will revert the stable of gpgme.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795
> 
> gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check?

working for me.

[Comment 7 Pacho Ramos 2016-05-06 11:03:50 UTC]

(In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #6)
> (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Alon Bar-Lev from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Chema Alonso from comment #3)
> > > > Anything I am doing wrong?
> > > 
> > > No, it took me a while to reproduce, the gpgme-1.5.3 assumes gpgsm-2.1 and
> > > send a command that is not supported. I opened a bug[1].
> > > 
> > > I will revert the stable of gpgme.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://bugs.g10code.com/gnupg/issue1795
> > 
> > gpgme-1.5.5 should resolve it, can you please check?
> 
> working for me.

Maybe we can finally do gpa-0.9.9 then? :)

[Comment 8 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2016-05-22 18:47:39 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #7)
> > working for me.
> 
> Maybe we can finally do gpa-0.9.9 then? :)

Sure! Will love to see old version go away.

[Comment 9 Tobias Klausmann (RETIRED) 2016-05-23 08:33:37 UTC]

Stable on alpha.

[Comment 10 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) 2016-12-26 12:04:34 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-12-29 10:45:29 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2016-12-30 09:39:22 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo 2017-01-01 12:44:33 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo 2017-01-03 10:39:24 UTC]

ppc64 stable. Closing.