First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 50968
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Netmon Herd <netmon@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Karl Dag Gursli <karl-d@gursli.com>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
snmptt-0.9.ebuild snmptt-0.9.ebuild (New Package) text/plain Karl Dag Gursli 2004-05-13 12:21 0000 802 bytes Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 50968 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 50968 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-05-13 12:18 0000
Hi 
I have made a ebuild for snmptt. snmptt is a Snmp Trap Translator. As far as I can see it is only depended on perl. More info http://www.snmptt.org/ 

I suggest the ebuild be put under net-analyzer/snmptt.
Karl

------- Comment #1 From Karl Dag Gursli 2004-05-13 12:21:07 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=31361) [edit]
snmptt-0.9.ebuild (New Package)

------- Comment #2 From Eldad Zack (RETIRED) 2004-07-05 04:16:49 0000 -------
A couple of comments:
1. instead of using snmptt_${PV} define:

MY_P=${P/-/_}

and use ${MY_P} instead.

2. since you're doing:
echo "traphandler default /usr/sbin/snmptt" >examples/snmptrapd.conf.sample 

there's no need to touch examples/snmptrapd.conf.sample first, it's redundant.


and a little spacing between blocks wouldn't harm you either.

you want to try to take another go at it, Karl?

------- Comment #3 From Eldad Zack (RETIRED) 2004-07-09 06:34:08 0000 -------
A few other issues:

if downloading from sourceforge, the SRC_URI should take the form of "mirror://sourceforge/" and add a RESTRICT="nomirror".

also, never mark a new ebuild x86, but ~x86 instead (if that is your arch).

now in portage.
thanks!

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug