Bug 502282 – sys-apps/portage-2.2.8-r1 Please stabilize

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Brian Dolbec (RETIRED) 2014-02-23 21:37:30 UTC]

This release has a number of fixes, a couple minor regressions, but still better overall.

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Pacho Ramos 2014-02-23 21:43:03 UTC]

Why not -r1?

[Comment 2 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) 2014-02-23 21:47:53 UTC]

I'd very much like to have at least two of the regressions being fixed before this version goes stable:

bug #497238 and bug #472104

[Comment 3 Sebastian Luther (few) 2014-02-23 22:01:25 UTC]

(In reply to Pacho Ramos from comment #1)
> Why not -r1?

Correct, 2.2.8-r1 please.

(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #2)
> I'd very much like to have at least two of the regressions being fixed
> before this version goes stable:
> 
> bug #497238 and bug #472104

These two regression are minor compared to all the slot operator related fixes in 2.2.8. Not worth waiting another 30 days for a release which hasn't happened yet.

[Comment 4 Brian Dolbec (RETIRED) 2014-02-23 22:32:28 UTC]

(In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #2)
> I'd very much like to have at least two of the regressions being fixed
> before this version goes stable:
> 
> bug #497238 and bug #472104

bug 472104 is not a regression.  Your re-opening it was a feature request to be able to turn off the new output.  There is a patch up for review before it is merged into portage.  It will likely be added to a portage-2.2.9 release.

Pacho, yes, sorry, I meant it to be -r1

[Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2014-02-24 00:52:16 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 6 Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) (RETIRED) 2014-02-24 14:16:51 UTC]

(In reply to Brian Dolbec from comment #4)
> (In reply to Lars Wendler (Polynomial-C) from comment #2)
> > I'd very much like to have at least two of the regressions being fixed
> > before this version goes stable:
> > 
> > bug #497238 and bug #472104
> 
> bug 472104 is not a regression.  Your re-opening it was a feature request to
> be able to turn off the new output.  There is a patch up for review before
> it is merged into portage.  It will likely be added to a portage-2.2.9
> release.
> 

Well both bugs will be quite a PITA for regular users who now get flooded with useless rebuilds and huge text output that's IMHO quite disturbing rather than helpful.

[Comment 7 Akinori Hattori 2014-03-02 11:44:11 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 8 Markus Meier 2014-03-05 21:27:37 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 9 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2014-03-08 15:35:28 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 10 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2014-03-09 09:57:40 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-03-14 10:51:20 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-03-19 13:53:28 UTC]

alpha stable

[Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-03-23 10:14:41 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo 2014-03-24 15:08:26 UTC]

ppc stable. Closing.