Bug 471912 – =dev-libs/xmlrpc-c-1.32.05-r1: fast stabilize

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2013-05-31 15:18:00 UTC]

This revision just fix Bug 460730 
So, i think we can go ahead w/o waiting  30 days.

[Comment 1 Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) 2013-05-31 15:36:10 UTC]

Please NOT stabilize upstream unstable tree version.

[Comment 2 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2013-05-31 15:40:25 UTC]

(In reply to Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) from comment #1)
> Please NOT stabilize upstream unstable tree version.

The previous revision is already stable

[Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2013-05-31 16:43:30 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 4 Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED) 2013-05-31 16:50:10 UTC]

(In reply to Markos Chandras from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) from comment #1)
> > Please NOT stabilize upstream unstable tree version.
> 
> The previous revision is already stable

Sorry for discussion in stablereq bug but let me notice that upstream marks 1.33.* as stable [1].

[1] http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/change_stable.html

[Comment 5 Markus Meier 2013-06-02 10:42:42 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-09 16:00:50 UTC]

sh stable

[Comment 7 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2013-06-10 19:09:13 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 8 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) 2013-06-12 20:21:08 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 9 Vicente Olivert Riera (RETIRED) 2013-06-16 08:51:29 UTC]

ppc ppc64 stable

[Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-26 03:04:34 UTC]

alpha stable

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-26 08:57:18 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-29 16:30:44 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-06-30 18:08:12 UTC]

s390 stable. Last arch, closing

[Comment 14 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2013-07-23 13:56:22 UTC]

(In reply to Alexander Vershilov from comment #4)
> (In reply to Markos Chandras from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) from comment #1)
> > > Please NOT stabilize upstream unstable tree version.
> > 
> > The previous revision is already stable
> 
> Sorry for discussion in stablereq bug but let me notice that upstream marks
> 1.33.* as stable [1].

You mean, "sorry I didn't bother to file a new bug report"? Please file a new bug report.

[Comment 15 Alexander Vershilov (RETIRED) 2013-07-23 14:14:22 UTC]

(In reply to Jeroen Roovers from comment #14)
> (In reply to Alexander Vershilov from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Markos Chandras from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to Andreis Vinogradovs ( slepnoga ) from comment #1)
> > > > Please NOT stabilize upstream unstable tree version.
> > > 
> > > The previous revision is already stable
> > 
> > Sorry for discussion in stablereq bug but let me notice that upstream marks
> > 1.33.* as stable [1].
> 
> You mean, "sorry I didn't bother to file a new bug report"? Please file a
> new bug report.

No. I've said that Adreis's comment is irrelevant to this bug because his statement is false, there is nothing to create bug report for. 

Thanks.