Is it OK to stabilize =net-firewall/shorewall-core-4.5.15 ? If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug.
Arches, please test and mark stable Target keywords: =net-firewall/shorewall-4.5.15: alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 =net-firewall/shorewall6-4.5.15: alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 =net-firewall/shorewall-core-4.5.15: alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 =net-firewall/shorewall-lite-4.5.15: alpha amd64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc x86 =net-firewall/shorewall6-lite-4.5.15: alpha amd64 hppa sparc x86 Setting normal severity for this bug, cause current stable version is out-of-sync
Stable for HPPA.
amd64: compiles fine and no repoman errors.
+ 04 Jun 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> shorewall-core-4.5.15.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on a report by Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani in + bug #470544. + 04 Jun 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> shorewall-4.5.15.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on a report by Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani in + bug #470544. + 04 Jun 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> shorewall6-4.5.15.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on a report by Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani in + bug #470544. + 04 Jun 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> shorewall-lite-4.5.15.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on a report by Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani in + bug #470544. + 04 Jun 2013; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> shorewall6-lite-4.5.15.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on a report by Elijah "Armageddon" El Lazkani in + bug #470544.
it missing sys-devel/bc else shorewall iprange does not work, should i make seperate bug ?
alpha stable
sparc stable
x86 stable
ppc stable
ppc64 stable. Last arch, closing
(In reply to Benny Pedersen from comment #5) > it missing sys-devel/bc else shorewall iprange does not work, should i make > seperate bug ? Yes, please file a bug.