Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 469520 - sys-apps/portage repoman errors on hardened profiles
Summary: sys-apps/portage repoman errors on hardened profiles
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Portage team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: InVCS
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-05-12 02:03 UTC by Patrick Lauer
Modified: 2013-05-12 09:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Patrick Lauer gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 02:03:08 UTC
dependency.badmasked          5
   sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.7_p1.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['>=dev-python/python-selinux-2.16']
   sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.7_p1.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['>=dev-python/python-selinux-2.16']
   sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.7_p1.ebuild: RDEPEND: x86(hardened/linux/x86/selinux) ['>=dev-python/python-selinux-2.16']
   sys-apps/portage/portage-9999.ebuild: DEPEND: **(empty profile) ['dev-lang/python:3.4']
   sys-apps/portage/portage-9999.ebuild: RDEPEND: **(empty profile) ['dev-lang/python:3.4']
Comment 1 Sven Vermeulen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 09:25:10 UTC
My bad, python-selinux was removed from the tree and I missed this (old) portage. 

OK if I remove the selinux dependency from it as we only currently support SELinux with amd64 and x86, and there are higher stable portage's for those architectures?
Comment 2 Zac Medico gentoo-dev 2013-05-12 09:39:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> My bad, python-selinux was removed from the tree and I missed this (old)
> portage. 
> 
> OK if I remove the selinux dependency from it as we only currently support
> SELinux with amd64 and x86, and there are higher stable portage's for those
> architectures?

Already done.