-- KDE4 not found, because Automoc4 not found. -- KDE4 not found, disabling KDE integration After installing automoc USE kde works fine.
Something like that? =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-irc/quassel/quassel-0.9.0.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -B -u -r1.1 quassel-0.9.0.ebuild --- quassel-0.9.0.ebuild 17 Apr 2013 04:13:32 -0000 1.1 +++ quassel-0.9.0.ebuild 7 May 2013 18:14:50 -0000 @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ X? ( ${GUI_RDEPEND} ) ) " -DEPEND="${RDEPEND}" +DEPEND="${RDEPEND} + kde? ( dev-util/automoc )" DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog README" Index: quassel-9999.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-irc/quassel/quassel-9999.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.67 diff -u -B -u -r1.67 quassel-9999.ebuild --- quassel-9999.ebuild 7 Apr 2013 21:28:23 -0000 1.67 +++ quassel-9999.ebuild 7 May 2013 18:14:50 -0000 @@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ X? ( ${GUI_RDEPEND} ) ) " -DEPEND="${RDEPEND}" +DEPEND="${RDEPEND} + kde? ( dev-util/automoc )"
Yes, or use kde eclasses and KDE_REQUIRED="optional".
I don't think I have commit powers, so this probably shouldn't be assigned to me :)
Manuel, you are proxy maintainer, it is correct to assign bugs to proxy maintainers and add proxy-maint@gentoo.org to CC. If you need to commit something, you can attach patch here and someone from proxy-maintainers herd will commit it.
Well, I wasn't aware that I am proxy maintainer. I'm the upstream author (so CCing me for Quassel bugs makes sense), but have never touched the ebuild (so expecting me to write patches for it probably makes less sense, as I'm only roughly familiar with best practices for ebuild writing). But there's a patch attached already (by hwoarang), so I guess someone could just apply that?
*quassel-0.9.3 (27 Mar 2014) 27 Mar 2014; Manuel Rüger <mrueg@gentoo.org> +quassel-0.9.3.ebuild, quassel-0.9.2.ebuild, quassel-9999.ebuild: Version bump. Also add missing dependency on dev-util/automoc. Fixes bug #468346.