Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 463082 - Please stabilize =dev-python/python-distutils-extra-2.37-r1
Summary: Please stabilize =dev-python/python-distutils-extra-2.37-r1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Python Gentoo Team
URL: http://packages.gentoo.org/package/de...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-03-24 20:26 UTC by Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED)
Modified: 2013-07-28 18:30 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-03-24 20:26:41 UTC
Is it OK to stabilize =dev-python/python-distutils-extra-2.37-r1 ?

If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords

for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword

to the bug.
Comment 1 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-05-15 04:09:43 UTC
Maintainer timeout (30 days). Arches please go ahead.
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-05-16 12:56:46 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-05-16 13:25:47 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-05-20 08:31:54 UTC
x86 stable. Last arch, closing
Comment 5 Julian Ospald 2013-07-28 08:19:40 UTC
you ignored bug 456610

thanks
Comment 6 Michał Górny archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2013-07-28 08:52:06 UTC
(In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #5)
> you ignored bug 456610
> 
> thanks

If you have a problem with the package, report a bug against it and not babble in stabilization bugs.
Comment 7 Julian Ospald 2013-07-28 12:28:44 UTC
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #6)
> (In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #5)
> > you ignored bug 456610
> > 
> > thanks
> 
> If you have a problem with the package, report a bug against it and not
> babble in stabilization bugs.

I did. So we ignore upstream bugs now when stabilizing packages?
Comment 8 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-07-28 17:26:08 UTC
(In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #7)
> I did. So we ignore upstream bugs now when stabilizing packages?

Enhancement bugs are not blocking stabilization.

If there is a serious problem with the package, there should be a Gentoo bug about it.

There was also an about 2 months period between this bug was filed and the maintainer timeout.
Comment 9 Julian Ospald 2013-07-28 18:30:12 UTC
(In reply to Paweł Hajdan, Jr. from comment #8)
> (In reply to Julian Ospald (hasufell) from comment #7)
> > I did. So we ignore upstream bugs now when stabilizing packages?
> 
> Enhancement bugs are not blocking stabilization.
> 
> If there is a serious problem with the package, there should be a Gentoo bug
> about it.
> 
> There was also an about 2 months period between this bug was filed and the
> maintainer timeout.

I gave YOU a link to a REGRESSION BUG and told YOU to not stabilize it yet.

Do I have to mirror all upstream bug reports now?

I still have a package that is affected by that regression and has a <dev-python/python-distutils-extra-2.34 dep. That is bad enough, but now it will also create funny blockers for people with stable arch.