Is it OK to stabilize =dev-libs/xapian-bindings-1.2.13 ? If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug.
fwiw, I think its a good idea.
Target: KEYWORDS="amd64 arm ppc ppc64 x86"
amd64 stable
x86 stable
ppc stable
ppc64 stable
For arm I get: dependency.bad 2 dev-libs/xapian-bindings/xapian-bindings-1.2.13.ebuild: DEPEND: arm(default/linux/arm/13.0) ['>=virtual/jdk-1.3', '>=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1'] dev-libs/xapian-bindings/xapian-bindings-1.2.13.ebuild: RDEPEND: arm(default/linux/arm/13.0) ['>=virtual/jre-1.3', '>=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1']
(In reply to comment #7) > For arm I get: > > dependency.bad 2 > dev-libs/xapian-bindings/xapian-bindings-1.2.13.ebuild: DEPEND: > arm(default/linux/arm/13.0) ['>=virtual/jdk-1.3', > '>=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1'] > dev-libs/xapian-bindings/xapian-bindings-1.2.13.ebuild: RDEPEND: > arm(default/linux/arm/13.0) ['>=virtual/jre-1.3', > '>=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1'] Go ahead and either mask or stabilize on arm. I don't know what the state of java is on arm.
arm stable. Last arch, closing