First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 45408
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Developer Relations Team <devrel@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Jon Portnoy (RETIRED) <avenj@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 45408 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 45408 blocks:

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-03-22 09:59 0000
Name: Travis Tilley
Physical location: Connecticut, USA
Email: ttilley@email.com
Areas of responsibility: Gentoo/AMD64
Mentor: avenj and jhuebel

lv has been fairly active for a while -- it would be much appreciated if his mentoring period was ~1 week rather than two

------- Comment #1 From Deedra Waters 2004-03-30 09:26:51 0000 -------
He's set

------- Comment #2 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2005-10-16 15:56:48 0000 -------
No cvs og bugs activity since january '05, retiring.

------- Comment #3 From Carsten Lohrke 2005-10-16 17:21:25 0000 -------
Still listed as maintainer of

sys-libs/libstdc++-v3
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-compat

------- Comment #4 From Jason Huebel (RETIRED) 2005-10-18 21:54:23 0000 -------
Other members of the amd64 team have taken over support of those packages.  As 
sad as I am to see lv retired for inactivity, he's been inactive for a while 
because of RL work. 

------- Comment #5 From Jason Huebel (RETIRED) 2005-10-18 21:57:30 0000 -------
amd64 team, who is responsible for those packages these days? 

------- Comment #6 From Herbie Hopkins (RETIRED) 2005-10-19 01:44:13 0000 -------
I've added myself and removed lv as maintainer from emul-linux-x86-compat.
libstdc++-v3 falls under the toolchain herd and so should be handled by them.

lv: Sorry to see you go.

------- Comment #7 From Jason Huebel (RETIRED) 2005-10-26 13:10:22 0000 -------
lv's back and wants to remain a dev. His RL work situation is allowing him to 
become active again. 
 
I'm going to administer the two tests to him due to his extended absence and 
get him back to work. :-)  

------- Comment #8 From Travis Tilley (RETIRED) 2005-10-26 13:12:57 0000 -------
While I have been away for quite some time, I intend to return to the amd64 dev
team in the not too distant future. What needs to be done to un-retire?

------- Comment #9 From Jason Huebel (RETIRED) 2005-10-26 13:35:29 0000 -------
You'll need to submit new ebuild and End-of-Mentoring quizzes.  I'll take care 
of looking those over.  Since your accounts were never deactivated, I think it 
would make sense to waive the probation period typical of returning or new 
devs. 
 
What does the rest of recruiters think? 

------- Comment #10 From Mike Doty 2005-10-26 14:58:46 0000 -------
I don't see why the probationary period matters; it's only there to prevent
someone from coming on then disappearing and retaining all the goodies that we
give to gentoo devs.

------- Comment #11 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2005-12-21 15:22:48 0000 -------
Guys, what's going on here?

If I don't get an update on the situation, say before january, I'm going to
turn this bug back to retiring status.

------- Comment #12 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-01-03 15:20:10 0000 -------
Reverting to retiring status because of lack of updates.

------- Comment #13 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-01-07 09:03:56 0000 -------
Infra: please retire lv.

------- Comment #14 From Lance Albertson 2006-01-07 13:05:32 0000 -------
Done

------- Comment #15 From Wernfried Haas 2006-01-07 14:36:50 0000 -------
Retired on forums.

------- Comment #16 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-01-07 15:31:34 0000 -------
All done.

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug