Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 454012 - Please stabilize =net-analyzer/labrea-2.5-r2
Summary: Please stabilize =net-analyzer/labrea-2.5-r2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Keywording and Stabilization (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Netmon project
URL: http://packages.gentoo.org/package/ne...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-01-25 15:00 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2013-01-30 22:43 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-25 15:00:22 UTC
Is it OK to stabilize =net-analyzer/labrea-2.5-r2 ?

If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords

for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword

to the bug.
Comment 1 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 01:11:09 UTC
Nothing interesting happened in this revision.
Comment 2 Sergey Popov gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 07:10:27 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Nothing interesting happened in this revision.

Please proceed with stabilization at least on amd64. x86 may pass, if they want to.
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 14:10:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Nothing interesting happened in this revision.
> 
> Please proceed with stabilization at least on amd64. x86 may pass, if they
> want to.

No, x86 should stabilise too.
Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 14:15:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Nothing interesting happened in this revision.

I never seen comment like this in stabilization request. 
The obviously answer is: why has been committed a new revision if we won't stabilize?
Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 14:19:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Nothing interesting happened in this revision.
> 
> I never seen comment like this in stabilization request. 

You're new here, right?

> The obviously answer is: why has been committed a new revision if we won't
> stabilize?

That's not an answer. You committed a revision that changed absolutely nothing interesting whatsoever for any users out there, except adding the ~amd64 keyword which you could have safely added to the previous revision.

But do go ahead, if it is "keywording theatre" you want.
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 14:29:43 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> That's not an answer. You committed a revision that changed absolutely
> nothing interesting whatsoever for any users out there, except adding the
> ~amd64 keyword which you could have safely added to the previous revision.

Are you able to see the changelog?

 -> Eapi4, convert src_install to emake, add ~amd64

If possible I don't like to do a big change into stable version, so I made a new revision.
 
> But do go ahead, if it is "keywording theatre" you want.

I don't want anything. I requested the stabilization to have an available stable version on amd64.
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 18:23:55 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 8 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-30 22:43:28 UTC
amd64 stable. Last arch, closing