Bug 452684 – sys-apps/lshw-02.16b-r2 stable request

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2013-01-17 15:45:37 UTC]

Another stable request. This version works with the hwids package, and stops installing another two copies of the OUI database, which are not used by the code anyway.

That's about the only change on the ebuild side for this version, so feel free to test and mark stable if it's okay for you.

[Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2013-01-17 15:48:21 UTC]

Also, Alpha/ARM/Sparc, please do test whether this makes sense at all. Upstream declare supports for x86 (and thus amd64), ia64 and PPC G4 (so I assume PPC64 as well)... no word on the others.

[Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-18 10:57:51 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-18 10:59:48 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-21 13:42:04 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-21 14:05:01 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-21 14:33:33 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-21 16:04:09 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 8 Markus Meier 2013-01-26 11:09:40 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-26 13:41:53 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> arm stable

@maekke
I get:

Atropos-XR ~ # lshw                                                                                                                                                                 
Bus error  
Atropos-XR ~ # cat /proc/cpuinfo 
Processor       : ARMv7 Processor rev 0 (v7l)

and

is fine for:

arm root # cat /proc/cpuinfo 
Processor       : Feroceon rev 0 (v5l) 



What's your output?

[Comment 10 Markus Meier 2013-01-26 15:25:37 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> What's your output?

original test was on armv5, where it works w/o issues. but this also works here on armv6 and armv7.
is this a regression on your box? I guess you should open a new bug for that issue...

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-01-26 22:55:20 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> is this a regression on your box? I guess you should open a new bug for that
> issue...

I'm pointing this here because as Diego said, there is no 'declared' support for ARM.

[Comment 12 Sergey Popov 2013-01-28 14:02:01 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> What's your output?

Mine, for example:

raspberry ~ # cat /proc/cpuinfo | head -1
Processor       : ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7 (v6l)
raspberry ~ # uname -a
Linux raspberry 3.2.27+ #250 PREEMPT Thu Oct 18 19:03:02 BST 2012 armv6l ARMv6-compatible processor rev 7 (v6l) BCM2708 GNU/Linux
raspberry ~ # lshw
raspberry                 
    description: Computer
    width: 32 bits
  *-core
       description: Motherboard
       physical id: 0
     *-memory
          description: System memory
          physical id: 0
          size: 438MiB
     *-cpu
          physical id: 1
          bus info: cpu@0
          size: 700MHz
          capacity: 700MHz
          capabilities: cpufreq
  *-network:0
       description: Wireless interface
       physical id: 1
       bus info: usb@1:1.2
       logical name: wlan0
       serial: 00:e0:4c:05:0f:38
       capabilities: ethernet physical wireless
       configuration: broadcast=yes driver=rtl8192cu ip=10.0.35.13 multicast=yes wireless=IEEE 802.11bg
  *-network:1 DISABLED
       description: Ethernet interface
       physical id: 2
       logical name: eth0
       serial: b8:27:eb:c5:1e:70
       size: 10Mbit/s
       capacity: 100Mbit/s
       capabilities: ethernet physical tp mii 10bt 10bt-fd 100bt 100bt-fd autonegotiation
       configuration: autonegotiation=on broadcast=yes driver=smsc95xx driverversion=22-Aug-2005 duplex=half firmware=smsc95xx USB 2.0 Ethernet link=no multicast=yes port=MII speed=10Mbit/s


As you see - works well. Strange issue...

[Comment 13 Markus Meier 2013-01-28 22:25:03 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > is this a regression on your box? I guess you should open a new bug for that
> > issue...
> 
> I'm pointing this here because as Diego said, there is no 'declared' support
> for ARM.

this might be valid, but it has been working and stabilized before this bug. I'd say open a new bug for your issue. removing arm.

[Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-02-04 09:44:21 UTC]

works on alpha

[Comment 15 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-02-04 09:48:28 UTC]

alpha stable. Last arch, closing