Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 449310 - <dev-libs/fribidi-0.19.5-r1: theoretically possible overflow
Summary: <dev-libs/fribidi-0.19.5-r1: theoretically possible overflow
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fribidi/f...
Whiteboard: B2 [noglsa?]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-12-30 15:06 UTC by Samuli Suominen (RETIRED)
Modified: 2016-03-18 08:10 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-30 15:06:08 UTC
Restricted Fedora security bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884000

Fedora is calling the patch "signedwarning.patch"

Upstream commit:

http://cgit.freedesktop.org/fribidi/fribidi/patch/?id=78dc3af68ed0e1aafe54c176b28dadee66eb306c

Unfortunately, I don't have more details due to the bug being restricted

This is fixed in Portage as =dev-libs/fribidi-0.19.5-r1
Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-12-30 15:11:21 UTC
As per the subject of the patch:

Subject: Fix theoretically possible overflow

I'd say B2
Comment 2 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-12-31 09:22:45 UTC
sparc stable
Comment 3 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-31 17:05:47 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 4 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-31 20:09:11 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-12-31 21:53:02 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 6 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-12-31 23:32:39 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-01 08:27:07 UTC
arm stable
Comment 8 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-01 19:25:32 UTC
alpha/ia64/sh stable
Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2013-01-04 13:11:28 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 10 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2013-01-04 13:32:21 UTC
All arches done. Vulnerable versions removed from Portage.
Comment 11 Chris Reffett (RETIRED) gentoo-dev Security 2013-12-11 02:05:50 UTC
Not much we can do here until this is unrestricted upstream and gets a CVE.
Comment 12 Ian Whyman (thev00d00) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2014-05-03 10:16:18 UTC
Any update on this?

Guess this can be closed as its been ~5months.
Comment 13 Mikle Kolyada (RETIRED) archtester Gentoo Infrastructure gentoo-dev Security 2014-05-03 10:32:45 UTC
(In reply to Ian Whyman (thev00d00) from comment #12)
> Any update on this?
> 
> Guess this can be closed as its been ~5months.

Not yet, we should write and then release GLSA. But there is no CVE for this bug, it seems.
Comment 14 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-03-04 12:43:25 UTC
Another 2 years and still no CVE and Redhat's bug is still restricted. Vulnerability mitigated with previous commits.
Comment 15 Aaron Bauman (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2016-03-18 08:10:18 UTC
Per previous comment still no CVE and many years since reported.