Bug 449298 – =app-text/texlive-2012: please stabilize

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description poletti.marco 2012-12-30 13:12:37 UTC]

Please stabilize =app-text/texlive-2012 and related ebuilds.

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Alexis Ballier 2013-04-12 10:20:30 UTC]

Created attachment 345356 [details]
list

list, grabbed from gnome-overlay tools

[Comment 2 Alexis Ballier 2013-04-12 10:21:34 UTC]

ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list.

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-13 07:31:28 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list.

This list is not fine for repoman. Please recheck it.

[Comment 4 Alexis Ballier 2013-04-13 17:07:20 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > ok, it should be good to go now, arches please go ahead, see attached list.
> 
> This list is not fine for repoman. Please recheck it.

you mean I shouldn't trust the script :)

what are the errors ? I thought I included all (tex or myself maintained) app-text/texlive{,-core} deps

[Comment 5 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-16 09:25:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> you mean I shouldn't trust the script :)
> 
> what are the errors ? I thought I included all (tex or myself maintained)
> app-text/texlive{,-core} deps

I see different error per arch. For amd64 atm I see:

  dependency.bad                9
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/gnome) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/kde) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(default/linux/amd64/13.0/developer) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/no-multilib/selinux) ['app-text/epspdf']
   app-text/texlive/texlive-2012.ebuild: RDEPEND: amd64(hardened/linux/amd64/selinux) ['app-text/epspdf']

[Comment 6 Alexis Ballier 2013-04-16 09:33:13 UTC]

Created attachment 345666 [details]
new list

yep, sorry, I forgot this one... it was long overdue (from tl-2011-r1 but not from current stable tl-2011...)

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-16 10:51:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Created attachment 345666 [details]
> new list
> 
> yep, sorry, I forgot this one... it was long overdue (from tl-2011-r1 but
> not from current stable tl-2011...)

Amd64 sounds good now. What about bug 465748 ?

[Comment 8 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2013-04-17 15:46:08 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 9 Alexis Ballier 2013-04-17 17:15:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #7)
> What about bug 465748 ?

Well, I probably can patch it to increase the buffer size but since dev-libs/icu has the same code and this program is not installed but rather only used to generate some other files: do we really care about this ?

[Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-17 19:52:48 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > What about bug 465748 ?
> 
> Well, I probably can patch it to increase the buffer size but since
> dev-libs/icu has the same code and this program is not installed but rather
> only used to generate some other files: do we really care about this ?

If this is trivial I'd like to see it fixed before go ahead

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-18 13:54:57 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-18 14:09:50 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 13 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-18 17:07:39 UTC]

ppc stable

[Comment 14 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-18 21:38:10 UTC]

ppc64 stable

[Comment 15 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-19 20:46:51 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 16 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-20 20:09:37 UTC]

alpha stable

[Comment 17 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-21 12:19:41 UTC]

arm stable

[Comment 18 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-21 22:37:53 UTC]

sparc stable

[Comment 19 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-22 08:08:01 UTC]

s390 stable

[Comment 20 Agostino Sarubbo 2013-04-25 21:30:02 UTC]

sh stable. Last arch, closing