Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 445682 - app-admin/localepurge-0.5.4: update ebuild
Summary: app-admin/localepurge-0.5.4: update ebuild
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Wim Muskee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-12-02 19:29 UTC by Wim Muskee
Modified: 2012-12-03 19:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
localepurge-0.5.4-r1.ebuild (localepurge-0.5.4-r1.ebuild,849 bytes, text/plain)
2012-12-02 19:30 UTC, Wim Muskee
Details
localepurge-0.5.4-prefix.patch (localepurge-0.5.4-prefix.patch,2.80 KB, patch)
2012-12-02 19:31 UTC, Wim Muskee
Details | Diff
localepurge-0.5.4.tbz2 (localepurge-0.5.4.tbz2,4.92 KB, application/bzip2)
2012-12-02 19:31 UTC, Wim Muskee
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wim Muskee 2012-12-02 19:29:47 UTC
This ebuild fixes bug #164544 and for a large part bug #183273.

Reproducible: Always




My first ebuild submission as would-be proxy maintainer for this package. I'm unsure whether to build from the new git repo (http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/localepurge.git) or build from tbz2 on mirror.

I choose the latter, and will include the files.
Comment 1 Wim Muskee 2012-12-02 19:30:33 UTC
Created attachment 331224 [details]
localepurge-0.5.4-r1.ebuild
Comment 2 Wim Muskee 2012-12-02 19:31:07 UTC
Created attachment 331226 [details, diff]
localepurge-0.5.4-prefix.patch
Comment 3 Wim Muskee 2012-12-02 19:31:54 UTC
Created attachment 331228 [details]
localepurge-0.5.4.tbz2
Comment 4 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-02 21:27:43 UTC
an git ebuild ( -9999 ) is also possible but we still need a stable tarball for it. Why keep the 0.5.4-prefix.patch as a separate patch? Can't you just merge this in the git code as well?
Comment 5 Wim Muskee 2012-12-03 16:41:57 UTC
Mostly because I was unsure of what the whole prefix thing meant, and I wanted to release the most important fixes first.

Also, with the prefix changes committed in the sources, the code won't be usable except by using the ebuild. I wonder if that's something we want.

I could change the sources to make it more prefix friendly though by creating a ${prefix} that can be configured at the start of the script.
Comment 6 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-03 19:17:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created attachment 331228 [details]
> localepurge-0.5.4.tbz2

I moved that to my devspace
Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-03 19:19:07 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 331224 [details]
> localepurge-0.5.4-r1.ebuild

No reason for -r1. There is no 0.5.4 ebuild anyway.
Comment 8 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-03 19:26:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Mostly because I was unsure of what the whole prefix thing meant, and I
> wanted to release the most important fixes first.
> 
> Also, with the prefix changes committed in the sources, the code won't be
> usable except by using the ebuild. I wonder if that's something we want.

I guess this is expected as this package is Gentoo specific ( I am not 100% sure about that ) and I am quite confident that 99% of the people who are using it, will have the ebuild installed anyway.

> 
> I could change the sources to make it more prefix friendly though by
> creating a ${prefix} that can be configured at the start of the script.

Whatever works for you I don't mind ;)
Comment 9 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-12-03 19:27:14 UTC
+*localepurge-0.5.4 (03 Dec 2012)
+
+  03 Dec 2012; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org>
+  +files/localepurge-0.5.4-prefix.patch, +localepurge-0.5.4.ebuild,
+  metadata.xml:
+  Version bump. Add Wim Muskee <wimmuskee@gmail.com> as maintainer. Bug #445682
+