Created attachment 329568 [details] collectd-5.1.1.ebuild New version that fixes some of the floating patches we've been running. Had to bake a new -lt patch.
Created attachment 329570 [details, diff] collectd-5.1.1-lt.patch
Created attachment 329572 [details] collectd-5.1.1.ebuild Since we don't have 4.x in tree, we don't have to inform users about having to upgrade their environment anymore. Removed that line (we could keep it if we still have migrations. Thoughts?) Also, these patches can be dropped from tree (if we drop 5.1.0): - collectd-4.10.1-libiptc.patch - collectd-4.10.1-libperl.patch - collectd-4.10.1-noowniptc.patch - collectd-4.10.2-libnotify-0.7.patch - collectd-4.10.3-lt.patch - collectd-5.1.0-mongoc06.patch - collectd-5.1.0-netlink.patch if we keep 5.1.0, it narrows down to: - collectd-4.10.1-libiptc.patch - collectd-4.10.1-noowniptc.patch - collectd-4.10.2-libnotify-0.7.patch
(In reply to comment #1) > Created attachment 329570 [details, diff] [details, diff] > collectd-5.1.1-lt.patch Is this patch upstream or something?
(In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Created attachment 329570 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] > > collectd-5.1.1-lt.patch > > Is this patch upstream or something? I'm not sure. The previous maintainer has carried this for a while: http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-admin/collectd/files/collectd-4.10.3-lt.patch?revision=1.1&view=markup I recall seeing some talk about this on the collectd mailing list a year ago, but not sure if the maintainer chose to do anything about it (or recognising it as a problem)
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > Created attachment 329570 [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] [details, diff] > > > collectd-5.1.1-lt.patch > > > > Is this patch upstream or something? > > I'm not sure. The previous maintainer has carried this for a while: > http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/app-admin/collectd/ > files/collectd-4.10.3-lt.patch?revision=1.1&view=markup > > I recall seeing some talk about this on the collectd mailing list a year > ago, but not sure if the maintainer chose to do anything about it (or > recognising it as a problem) ah ok that's fine
+*collectd-5.1.1 (19 Nov 2012) + + 19 Nov 2012; Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> +collectd-5.1.1.ebuild, + +files/collectd-5.1.1-lt.patch: + Version bump. Bug #443170. Thanks to Johan Bergström <bugs@bergstroem.nu> +