Is it OK to stabilize =dev-util/cpptest-1.1.2 ? If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword to the bug.
(In reply to comment #0) > Is it OK to stabilize =dev-util/cpptest-1.1.2 ? no objections. > If so, please CC all arches which have stable keywords > for older versions of this package and add STABLEREQ keyword > to the bug. done. TARGET: amd64, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86
Tested amd64: ok Tested ppc: ok Tested x86: ok I have attached a polished ebuild bumped to EAPI4.
Created attachment 328262 [details] cpptest-1.1.2.ebuild
(In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 328262 [details] > cpptest-1.1.2.ebuild Thanks for the improved version and the hint on prune_libtool_files (which I didn't know about before). + 04 Nov 2012; Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org> cpptest-1.1.2.ebuild: + Apply EAPI 4 patch by Vicente Olivert Riera (bug #441310) +
amd64 stable
stable ppc ppc64
Builds fine on x86. Please mark stable for x86.
x86 stable
sparc keywords dropped