First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 44121
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Python Gentoo Team <python@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Hans-Christian Armingeon <mog.johnny@gmx.net>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
pykde-3.7.4-r2.ebuild pykde-3.7.4-r2.ebuild text/plain Rob Cakebread 2004-04-15 13:11 0000 2.17 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 44121 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 44121 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2004-03-09 04:21 0000
# emerge -u dev-python/pykde
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) dev-python/pykde-3.7.4-r2 to /
>>> md5 src_uri ;-) PyKDE-3.7-4.tar.gz
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking PyKDE-3.7-4.tar.gz to /var/tmp/portage/pykde-3.7.4-r2/work
>>> Source unpacked.
--------------------------- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---------------------------
LOG FILE = "/tmp/sandbox-dev-python_-_pykde-3.7.4-r2-2258.log"

open_wr:   /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Uranus 2004-03-22 12:34:53 0000 -------
same here

------- Comment #2 From Rob Cakebread 2004-04-15 13:11:45 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=29361) [edit]
suggested fix

Simply uses this as a suggested fix:

31a32,34
>	mkdir -p ${QTDIR}/etc/settings
>	addwrite "${QTDIR}/etc/settings"
>

I can't reproduce the error so can Hans-Christian and Uranus try this ebuild
and
let us know if it works? I'm not sure its an acceptable solution, but its
done in a few other ebuilds.

------- Comment #3 From Jan van Dijk 2004-04-30 16:28:49 0000 -------
Rob, your fix works, thanks. 

------- Comment #4 From Stuart Marks 2004-05-05 13:25:14 0000 -------
Ok, plain old "#emerge pykde" does not work for me either because of this
sandbox violation.  I tried "#FEATURES=-sandbox emerge pykde" but it exited
with the following errors (lots of them):

/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In constructor `
   sipKProcessController::sipKProcessController()':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:139: error: `
   KProcessController::KProcessController()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcess.cpp:2001: error: within this context
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:140: error: `
   KProcessController::~KProcessController()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcess.cpp:2001: error: within this context
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In destructor `virtual
   sipKProcessController::~sipKProcessController()':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:140: error: `
   KProcessController::~KProcessController()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcess.cpp:2006: error: within this context
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In function `PyObject*
   sipDo_KProcessController_setupHandlers(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:131: error: `static void
   KProcessController::setupHandlers()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp:339: error: within this context
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In function `PyObject*
   sipDo_KProcessController_resetHandlers(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:132: error: `static void
   KProcessController::resetHandlers()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp:362: error: within this context
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp: In function `PyObject*
   sipDo_KProcessController_slotDoHousekeeping(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp:467: error: no matching function for call to `
   KProcessController::slotDoHousekeeping(int&)'
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:120: error: candidates are: void
   KProcessController::slotDoHousekeeping()
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In function `void
   sipDealloc_KProcessController(sipThisType*)':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:140: error: `virtual
   KProcessController::~KProcessController()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp:511: error: within this context
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h: In function `PyObject*
   sipNew_KProcessController(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kprocctrl.h:140: error: `virtual
   KProcessController::~KProcessController()' is private
sipkdecoreKProcessController.cpp:564: error: within this context
sipkdecoreKApplication.cpp: In function `PyObject*
   sipDo_KApplication_xioErrhandler(PyObject*, PyObject*)':
sipkdecoreKApplication.cpp:2620: error: no matching function for call to `
   KApplication::xioErrhandler()'
/usr/kde/3.2/include/kapplication.h:1140: error: candidates are: int
   KApplication::xioErrhandler(Display*)
make[1]: *** [kdecorehuge0.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/pykde-3.7.4-r2/work/PyKDE-3.7-4/kdecore'
make: *** [sub-kdecore] Error 2

!!! ERROR: dev-python/pykde-3.7.4-r2 failed.
!!! Function src_compile, Line 70, Exitcode 2
!!! (no error message)

------- Comment #5 From Michael Holcomb 2004-05-07 22:31:58 0000 -------
I had this issue as well, and used rob's fix and was able to work around it.

------- Comment #6 From Carsten Lohrke 2004-05-25 04:42:51 0000 -------
*** Bug 44176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #7 From Carsten Lohrke 2004-05-25 05:16:01 0000 -------
fixed this, a new, kde 3.2 compatible, pykde version will be out in a week
together with kde 3.2.3

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug