First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 44116
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Gentoo Fonts Team <fonts@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.fr>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
fontconfig-2.2.1-freetype-compat.patch patch to correct the inclusion of freetype patch Benoit Boissinot 2004-03-09 03:55 0000 1.46 KB Details | Diff
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 44116 depends on: Show dependency tree
Show dependency graph
Bug 44116 blocks: 49494
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)







View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug

Description:   Opened: 2004-03-09 03:54 0000 
This patch correct the inclusion of freetype. Without it, fontconfig will not
compile with freetype-2.1.7

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Benoit Boissinot 2004-03-09 03:55:30 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=27085) [edit]
patch to correct the inclusion of freetype

------- Comment #2 From Vaclav Slavik 2004-03-13 04:48:59 0000 ------- 
New upstream releases of fontconfig and Xft fix this problem (fontconfig-2.2.2
and Xft-2.1.4).

------- Comment #3 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-03-13 04:52:42 0000 ------- 
That doesn't really matter, we need it working in all available ebuilds. So the
patch is still useful.

------- Comment #4 From Martin Mokrejs 2004-09-17 14:04:32 0000 ------- 
Umm, shoudl the subject be for fontconfig-2.2.1 or something lower? I have
2.2.2 and I don't need it. And the file tto be patched has:

#ifndef _FCFREETYPE_H_
#define _FCFREETYPE_H_
#include <ft2build.h>
#include FT_FREETYPE_H

------- Comment #5 From Mike Gardiner (RETIRED) 2004-12-21 00:07:49 0000 ------- 
Fonts guys, can we get this in?

------- Comment #6 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-12-21 06:32:20 0000 ------- 
can the ppc64 guys please mark 2.2.2 or 2.2.3 stable for their arch ?

------- Comment #7 From Markus Rothe 2004-12-21 07:58:13 0000 ------- 
2.2.3 stable on ppc64

------- Comment #8 From Benoit Boissinot 2004-12-21 08:04:27 0000 ------- 
closing ? (looks like it is stable on all arch)

Benoit

------- Comment #9 From foser (RETIRED) 2004-12-22 07:42:22 0000 ------- 
closing
First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug