Bug 436186 – Stabilize =sys-apps/{usbutils-006,pciutils-3.1.10,hwids-20121119}

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-25 09:12:35 UTC]

All of these at the same time. Should be good to go.

[Comment 1 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-25 09:14:19 UTC]

package.keywords compat list:

=sys-apps/hwids-20120916
=sys-apps/usbutils-006
=sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.9-r2

[Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) 2012-09-25 14:07:53 UTC]

Go for hwids-20120922 — there's no reason to stable non-latest database.

[Comment 3 mike 2012-09-25 17:07:27 UTC]

x86 partial ok (Repoman not ok, compiles ok)

>>> Repoman output:

RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
  KEYWORDS.missing              1
   sys-apps/hwids/hwids-99999999.ebuild
RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment?
              I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy."


RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
  KEYWORDS.dropped              1
   sys-apps/usbutils/usbutils-006.ebuild: x86-fbsd
RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment?
              I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy."


RepoMan scours the neighborhood...
  RDEPEND.implicit              2
   sys-apps/pciutils/pciutils-3.1.4.ebuild: RDEPEND is not explicitly assigned
   sys-apps/pciutils/pciutils-3.1.7.ebuild: RDEPEND is not explicitly assigned
RepoMan sez: "You're only giving me a partial QA payment?
              I'll take it this time, but I'm not happy."

[Comment 4 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 02:55:28 UTC]

Stable for HPPA.

[Comment 5 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 02:55:56 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> x86 partial ok (Repoman not ok, compiles ok)

Repoman is fine in this case. Maybe you should invest in finding out what it's saying.

[Comment 6 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 10:29:02 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
>   KEYWORDS.missing              1
>    sys-apps/hwids/hwids-99999999.ebuild

This is how it should be as it's live ebuild.

>   KEYWORDS.dropped              1
>    sys-apps/usbutils/usbutils-006.ebuild: x86-fbsd

This is how it should be as ~*-bsd doesn't have libusb-1 or libusbx-1 keyworded (yet) and I've been in contact with the team.

>   RDEPEND.implicit              2
>    sys-apps/pciutils/pciutils-3.1.4.ebuild: RDEPEND is not explicitly
> assigned
>    sys-apps/pciutils/pciutils-3.1.7.ebuild: RDEPEND is not explicitly
> assigned

These are fine since they are of from older versions that shall be removed after this bug is handled.

Please read the output before copy'n'pasting in future :-)

[Comment 7 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 10:32:02 UTC]

amd64/ppc/ppc64/x86 stable

[Comment 8 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 10:35:58 UTC]

Updated list

=sys-apps/hwids-20120922
=sys-apps/usbutils-006
=sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.10

[Comment 9 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) 2012-09-26 10:38:31 UTC]

(In reply to comment #8)
> Updated list
> 
> =sys-apps/hwids-20120922
> =sys-apps/usbutils-006
> =sys-apps/pciutils-3.1.10

Moved stable keywords from 3.1.9-r2 to 3.1.10. Sorry about mixing the version.

[Comment 10 mike 2012-09-26 18:59:07 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
ok, I didn't have any information about the future-plans of usbutils/pciutils-ebuilds so I had to assume those Repoman-warnings where of importance. I know it better now.

[Comment 11 Anthony Basile 2012-10-02 12:55:18 UTC]

stable arm

[Comment 12 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-12-17 17:48:44 UTC]

ia64 stable

[Comment 13 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-12-29 17:35:08 UTC]

alpha/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable