Bug 417027 – Please stabilize sys-devel/llvm-3.0-r2 media-libs/opengtl-0.9.16

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Bernard Cafarelli 2012-05-22 08:34:15 UTC]

3.0 has been in tree for some time, and -r2 has some additional fixes (like a correct soname for the lib)

llvm has a nice test suite also for you to confirm it was compiled ok :)

Please test and mark stable =sys-devel/llvm-3.0-r2

[Comment 1 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-05-22 11:24:02 UTC]

It needs new binutils, please re add arches when 414865 is fixed

[Comment 2 Andreas K. Hüttel 2012-05-22 15:49:07 UTC]

It would be great if you could stable 

 media-libs/opengtl-0.9.16

at the same time as sys-devel/llvm-3.0-r2 (earlier opengtl versions need llvm-2*)

[Comment 3 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) 2012-05-23 11:50:03 UTC]

Just question, Why do you think it needs new binutils, when running on stable system I can install both llvm-3.0 and clang-3.0 and compile software without issues.

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-05-23 12:18:23 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Just question, Why do you think it needs new binutils, when running on
> stable system I can install both llvm-3.0 and clang-3.0 and compile software
> without issues.

repoman says it

[Comment 5 Bernard Cafarelli 2012-05-23 15:57:42 UTC]

llvm itself only requires >=2.18, but the (optional) gold plugin requires 2.22. If binutils stabling takes too much time, we can quickly make a 3.1 without USE=gold for packages that neeed llvm-3.0

[Comment 6 Andreas K. Hüttel 2012-07-06 21:04:51 UTC]

What's the status here?

[Comment 7 Bernard Cafarelli 2012-07-09 11:36:50 UTC]

No progress on binutils-2.22 stabilization, so nothing changed here. If llvm-3.0 is needed stable somewhere, I can push a version for stabilization without USE=gold (removing the depend on binutils-2.22)

[Comment 8 Johannes Huber (RETIRED) 2012-08-19 18:56:24 UTC]

> Keywords for sys-devel/binutils:
>               |                           | u   |  
>               | a a             p     s   | n   |  
>               | l m   h i m m   p s   p   | u s | r
>               | p d a p a 6 i p c 3   a x | s l | e
>               | h 6 r p 6 8 p p 6 9 s r 8 | e o | p
>               | a 4 m a 4 k s c 4 0 h c 6 | d t | o
>---------------+---------------------------+-----+-------
>       2.22-r1 | ~ + + + ~ ~ ~ ~ + + ~ ~ + | o   | gentoo

I think required arches for llvm are done. Go?

[Comment 9 Bernard Cafarelli 2012-08-23 12:47:16 UTC]

Indeed, go!

Arches, please test and mark stable sys-devel/llvm-3.0-r2 (amd64, ppc, x86).
amd64/x86, please stable media-libs/opengtl-0.9.16 at the same time

Thanks!

[Comment 10 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-08-24 14:24:22 UTC]

amd64 stable

[Comment 11 Myckel Habets 2012-09-24 05:19:47 UTC]

llvm builds and runs tests fine on x86. Build and ran rdep mesa without a problem.
opengtl fails tests, but is not a regression.

Please mark stable for x86.

[Comment 12 Andreas Schürch 2012-09-24 11:43:58 UTC]

x86 done, Thanks Myckel!

[Comment 13 Bernard Cafarelli 2012-11-16 23:24:30 UTC]

Everything done except sys-devel/llvm-3.0-r2 on ppc, and stabling is now underway for 3.1-r2 in bug #443508. So I'm marking this one as done