Title is all. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86-fbsd USE="-unicode" emerge dev-libs/expat Actual Results: >>> Emerging (1 of 1) dev-libs/expat-2.1.0 * expat-2.1.0.tar.gz RMD160 SHA1 SHA256 size ;-) ... [ ok ] <snip> /bin/bash ./libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/install -c xmlwf/xmlwf /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/image//usr/bin/xmlwf libtool: install: warning: `libexpat.la' has not been installed in `/usr/lib64' libtool: install: /usr/bin/install -c xmlwf/.libs/xmlwf /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/image//usr/bin/xmlwf /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/work/expat-2.1.0/doc/xmlwf.1 /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/image//usr/share/man/man1 * ERROR: dev-libs/expat-2.1.0 failed (install phase): * unable to read SONAME from libexpatu.so * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 85: Called src_install * environment, line 2291: Called gen_usr_ldscript '-a' 'expat' 'expatu' 'expatw' * environment, line 1526: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * [[ -z ${tlib} ]] && die "unable to read SONAME from ${lib}"; * * If you need support, post the output of 'emerge --info =dev-libs/expat-2.1.0', * the complete build log and the output of 'emerge -pqv =dev-libs/expat-2.1.0'. * The complete build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/temp/environment'. * S: '/var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/expat-2.1.0/work/expat-2.1.0'
Created attachment 309035 [details, diff] sample patch for expat-2.1.0.ebuild
Thanks for the patch. Applied to 2.1.0.
actually, i added that gen_usr_ldscript call for libexpat and nothing more because i dumped libbsdxml in freebsd which was a copy of libexpat, but then we need libexpat in /. there's no need for libexpatu or libexpatw, i'm going to simplify it and just let libexpat in /
(In reply to comment #3) > actually, i added that gen_usr_ldscript call for libexpat and nothing more > because i dumped libbsdxml in freebsd which was a copy of libexpat, but then > we need libexpat in /. there's no need for libexpatu or libexpatw, i'm going > to simplify it and just let libexpat in / well this all was clear to me, but I did a design choice of keeping the library installations of libexpat, libexpatu, and libexpatw uniform but i'm not going to fight you on this one if you like it better this way :)
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > actually, i added that gen_usr_ldscript call for libexpat and nothing more > > because i dumped libbsdxml in freebsd which was a copy of libexpat, but then > > we need libexpat in /. there's no need for libexpatu or libexpatw, i'm going > > to simplify it and just let libexpat in / > > well this all was clear to me, but I did a design choice of keeping the > library installations of libexpat, libexpatu, and libexpatw uniform this makes sense too, but for me, the smaller / is, the better :)
