Created attachment 308373 [details] stablelist-v1 As per summary please proceed with testing. @Matt: could you again use your magic virtual hosts to generate the images? Also check the resulting size of binaries as I think that using the -debug package might be not needed (it should be just extra 20 megs). @arches: for now test all the packages expect the binary ones which will be done after you test it on your archs. Also let me know if some package is missing from the list.
(In reply to comment #0) > Created attachment 308373 [details] > stablelist-v1 There is no app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.5.2-r1 amd64 x86 in the tree (yet?).
(In reply to comment #1) > > There is no > app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.5.2-r1 amd64 x86 > in the tree (yet?). Right it should be without revision, bad copy&paste :) anything else broken?
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > There is no > > app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.5.2-r1 amd64 x86 > > in the tree (yet?). > > Right it should be without revision, bad copy&paste :) anything else broken? Tests fail, reported in bug 352901.
Stabilisation of app-office-libreoffice-3.5.2 and its friends @arches: for now test all the packages expect the binary ones (which will be done after you test and stabilize the source ones on your archs). Also let scarabeus know if some package is missing from the list.
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "=app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.5.2.2".
(In reply to comment #5) > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy > "=app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.5.2.2". @arches: for now test all the packages expect the binary ones which will be done after you test it on your archs. Also let me know if some package is missing from the list.
(In reply to comment #6) > @arches: for now test all the packages expect the binary ones which will be > done after you test it on your archs. Also let me know if some package is > missing from the list. Sorry man, my bad :/
amd64: app-office/libreoffice-3.5.2.2 app-office/libreoffice-l10n-3.5.2-r1 been using it for a while, that's a pass
amd64 ok
+ 20 Apr 2012; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> libreoffice-l10n-3.5.2.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Elijah "Armageddon" El + Lazkani & Maurizio "k01" Camisaschi in bug #411449. + 20 Apr 2012; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> libreoffice-3.5.2.2.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Elijah "Armageddon" El + Lazkani & Maurizio "k01" Camisaschi in bug #411449. + 20 Apr 2012; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> mdds-0.5.4.ebuild: + Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Elijah "Armageddon" El + Lazkani & Maurizio "k01" Camisaschi in bug #411449.
x86 stable
Arches, please proceed now with testing and stabilizing the binpackages: app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.5.2.2 amd64 x86 app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-3.5.2.2 amd64 x86 Not sure what's still up with wps2odt, here ppc is missing: app-text/wpd2odt-0.8.1 ppc
(In reply to comment #12) > > Not sure what's still up with wps2odt, here ppc is missing: > > app-text/wpd2odt-0.8.1 ppc I forgot to commit the keywords to cvs there. Done now.
amd64 stable
@x86: please proceed with app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.5.2.2-r1
Because of the security bug triggered icu upgrade we needed new binpackages. amd64, x86: please test and mark stable app-office/libreoffice-bin-3.5.2.2-r1 app-office/libreoffice-bin-debug-3.5.2.2-r1
x86: all binary installing fine. Also all RDEPEND compile fine for me and run fine for me all time. repoman: (libreoffice-bin): metadata.warning 1 app-office/libreoffice-bin/metadata.xml: unused local USE-description: 'offlinehelp' Please fix metadata issue and mark stable for x86.
x86 stable, thanks Mikle.
