Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 405725 - net-misc/mediatomb-0.12.1: fails to compile against ffmpeg-0.10
Summary: net-misc/mediatomb-0.12.1: fails to compile against ffmpeg-0.10
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: ffmpeg-0.10
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2012-02-25 10:21 UTC by Agostino Sarubbo
Modified: 2012-03-11 04:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
build.log (mediatomb-0.12.1:20120225-101640.log,69.83 KB, text/plain)
2012-02-25 10:21 UTC, Agostino Sarubbo 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2012-02-25 10:21:16 UTC 
Created attachment 303141 [details]
build.log

net-misc/mediatomb-0.12.1 fails to compile
Comment 1 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2012-02-25 22:11:54 UTC 
*mediatomb-0.12.1-r1 (07 Dec 2011)

  07 Dec 2011; Jeff Gardner <je_fro@gentoo.org> +mediatomb-0.12.1-r1.ebuild,
  +files/mediatomb-0.12.1-libav7.patch:
  Add libav-0.7 support, thanks to Daniel van Vugt (vanvugt)


im tempted to just put the patch in 0.12.1 and remove -r1, but i'll let you decide if you prefer a stabilisation round for -r1 :)
Comment 2 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-02-26 21:30:00 UTC 
Huh? How is a libav patch related to ffmpeg-0.10? Excuse my ignorance, please explain.
Comment 3 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2012-02-26 22:04:35 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Huh? How is a libav patch related to ffmpeg-0.10? Excuse my ignorance, please
> explain.

libav is ffmpeg fork, ffmpeg pulls libav changes, so when libav changes api, some time later ffmpeg does
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-02-26 22:28:40 UTC 
Great. So you are saying that mediatomb-0.12.1-r1 is already fixed? Please confirm and I'll just mark it stable for all (I guess a compilation fix should not be a revbump and marking stable for all should be ok)
Comment 5 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2012-02-26 23:21:15 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Great. So you are saying that mediatomb-0.12.1-r1 is already fixed? Please
> confirm and I'll just mark it stable for all (I guess a compilation fix should
> not be a revbump and marking stable for all should be ok)

yes -r1 is fine
Comment 6 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2012-03-06 18:09:54 UTC 
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Great. So you are saying that mediatomb-0.12.1-r1 is already fixed? Please
> > confirm and I'll just mark it stable for all (I guess a compilation fix should
> > not be a revbump and marking stable for all should be ok)
> 
> yes -r1 is fine

ping :)
Comment 7 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2012-03-11 04:36:11 UTC 
+  11 Mar 2012; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> mediatomb-0.12.1-r1.ebuild:
+  stabilize for amd64/x86 (compilation failure that didn't need to be a
+  revbump) bug 405725