Bug 405167 – net-nds/openldap-2.4.28-r1 : add static-libs IUSE support

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Agostino Sarubbo 2012-02-21 16:26:21 UTC]

$summary, clean also unneeded .la files

/usr/lib64/liblber.a
/usr/lib64/libldap.a
/usr/lib64/libldap_r.a
/usr/lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2.8.1
/usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2.8.1
/usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2.8.1
/usr/lib64/libldap_r.so
/usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.4.so.2
/usr/lib64/libldap.so
/usr/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2
/usr/lib64/liblber.so
/usr/lib64/liblber-2.4.so.2
/usr/lib64/libldap.la
/usr/lib64/libldap_r.la
/usr/lib64/liblber.la

[Comment 1 Sean McGovern 2012-09-17 13:32:34 UTC]

I modified the current ebuild for 2.4.31 to use static-libs and it seems to be OK for me. I did in the process discover that mail-client/pine requires the static libs, but there is already a request (#371593) to remove this ebuild as it is largely dead upstream.

Before I submit this for approval, should I be making it work with all the previous ebuilds for openldap or is just the current one OK?

[Comment 2 Sean McGovern 2012-10-17 21:24:50 UTC]

Created attachment 326794 [details, diff]
patch converting openldap for static-libs USE flag

Attached is a patch to 2.4.33 which modifies the ebuild for the static-libs USE flag. Also removes .la files from /usr/$(get_libdir). Unlike many other packages, openldap actually uses LTDL from libtool, so don't remove the .la files anywhere else.

[Comment 3 Sean McGovern 2012-11-17 19:34:28 UTC]

*ping!*

[Comment 4 Sean McGovern 2013-02-04 14:57:48 UTC]

again, *ping!*

[Comment 5 Sean McGovern 2013-10-15 17:29:56 UTC]

* 3rd ping!

Suggest changing title to >=net-nds/openldap-2.4.35 as lower versions are currently hardmasked due to recent security vulnerabilities.

[Comment 6 Nikoli 2013-10-24 04:29:48 UTC]

Created attachment 361756 [details, diff]
patch

Sean, thank you for patch, works fine here. Changed it a bit: better use prune_libtool_files instead of find.

[Comment 7 Robin Johnson 2014-10-12 06:28:05 UTC]

in 2.4.40