Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 403185 - sys-power/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-r3 calls patch directly instead of epatch
Summary: sys-power/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-r3 calls patch directly instead of epatch
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal normal (vote)
Assignee: Michael Weber (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-11 16:01 UTC by Benedict Holysword
Modified: 2012-02-13 19:58 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
emerge --info output (emerge_info,17.45 KB, text/plain)
2012-02-11 16:01 UTC, Benedict Holysword 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Benedict Holysword 2012-02-11 16:01:12 UTC 
Created attachment 301571 [details]
emerge --info output

Attempting to emerge phc-intel waits for user to input data:


>>> Preparing source in /var/tmp/portage/sys-power/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-r3/work/phc-intel-0.3.2-12-1 ...
`/usr/src/linux/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c' -> `phc-intel.c'
`/usr/src/linux/drivers/cpufreq/mperf.h' -> `./mperf.h'
patching file phc-intel.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] n
Apply anyway? [n] n


There is no problem if you are using -j1 option, but otherwise the message just does not appear. Took me a while to figure out why this package was never emerging. Also, I'm not sure if I should have chosen n in both options.
Comment 1 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2012-02-13 19:58:39 UTC 
+  13 Feb 2012; Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-r3.ebuild,
+  files/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-2.6.35.patch,
+  files/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-2.6.36.patch,
+  files/phc-intel-0.3.2.12.1-2.6.37.patch:
+  replace patch w/ epatch, fix patchsets (bug 403185)
+