Bug 396547 – dev-ruby/rails-3.1.3 rekeywording request

• Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Hans de Graaff 2011-12-30 19:42:55 UTC]

More new dependencies for the remainder of the rails 3.1.3 packages.

=dev-ruby/rack-ssl
=dev-ruby/hike-1.2.1
=dev-ruby/sprockets-2.0.3-r1
=dev-ruby/mail-2.3.0

=dev-ruby/actionpack-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/actionmailer-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/activerecord-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/railties-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/rails-3.1.3

[Comment 1 Hans de Graaff 2011-12-31 14:39:41 UTC]

Please also include dev-ruby/haml-3.1.4-r1 in this list. Full ordered list:

=dev-ruby/rack-ssl
=dev-ruby/hike-1.2.1
=dev-ruby/sprockets-2.0.3-r1
=dev-ruby/mail-2.3.0

=dev-ruby/actionpack-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/actionmailer-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/activerecord-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/railties-3.1.3
=dev-ruby/rails-3.1.3

=dev-ruby/haml-3.1.4-r1

[Comment 2 Fabian Groffen 2011-12-31 21:48:06 UTC]

there is no such thing as =dev-ruby/haml-3.1.4-r1, so I keyworded =dev-ruby/haml-3.1.4

[Comment 3 Hans de Graaff 2012-01-01 07:55:08 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> there is no such thing as =dev-ruby/haml-3.1.4-r1

My mistake, it's there now. I've moved prefix keywords forward.

[Comment 4 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2012-03-01 13:49:24 UTC]

What about ~x86?
We are CC'ed on a bug down the dep chain (e.g. bug 397433)

[Comment 5 Hans de Graaff 2012-03-07 18:42:48 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> What about ~x86?

Yes please, apologies for forgetting to add you as well.

[Comment 6 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2012-03-11 14:18:33 UTC]

ppc64 done

[Comment 7 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2012-05-05 18:47:08 UTC]

ia64/sparc keywords dropped

[Comment 8 Thomas Kahle (RETIRED) 2012-05-17 10:58:31 UTC]

x86 done.

[Comment 9 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-12-17 11:14:25 UTC]

my generated list includes dev-ruby/execjs that wants v8.

v8 atm does not build on ppc..

[Comment 10 Hans de Graaff 2012-12-17 18:59:38 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> my generated list includes dev-ruby/execjs that wants v8.
> 
> v8 atm does not build on ppc..

When the original bugs were filed spidermonkey was still an option. In any case, if you still want to keyword this for ppc, you can mask the asset-pipeline USE flag. That essentially means you could use Rails 3.1/2 on production servers, but not for development work.

[Comment 11 Agostino Sarubbo 2012-12-22 20:12:29 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > my generated list includes dev-ruby/execjs that wants v8.
> > 
> > v8 atm does not build on ppc..
> 
> When the original bugs were filed spidermonkey was still an option. In any
> case, if you still want to keyword this for ppc, you can mask the
> asset-pipeline USE flag. That essentially means you could use Rails 3.1/2 on
> production servers, but not for development work.

CC back ppc when you provide a repoman checked list that works.

[Comment 12 Hans de Graaff 2015-01-01 10:24:00 UTC]

This version of Rails is no longer in the tree.