time has passed, now that the regressions have hopefully been spotted and the spotted ones have been fixed, it should be time to move on. moreover there is a couple of bugfixes in texlive-core that have not been backported. (hopefully complete) partial list: app-text/texlive-2011 dev-texlive/*2011* app-text/texlive-core-2011-r5 >=app-text/ps2pkm-1.5_p20110705 >=app-text/dvipsk-5.991_p20110705 >=dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20110705 >=dev-libs/ptexenc-1.2.0_p20110705 thanks!
(In reply to comment #0) > time has passed, now that the regressions have hopefully been spotted and the > spotted ones have been fixed, it should be time to move on. moreover there is a > couple of bugfixes in texlive-core that have not been backported. > > (hopefully complete) partial list: > app-text/texlive-2011 > dev-texlive/*2011* > app-text/texlive-core-2011-r5 > >=app-text/ps2pkm-1.5_p20110705 > >=app-text/dvipsk-5.991_p20110705 > >=dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20110705 > >=dev-libs/ptexenc-1.2.0_p20110705 Maybe we've been spoiled over the years, but compared to https://393007.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=296671 https://394393.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=295865 the above list is useless, a lot of work done individually by everyone who wants to test or mark these packages. Maybe you should be using the automation tools they're using and publish a full list of targets.
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > time has passed, now that the regressions have hopefully been spotted and the > > spotted ones have been fixed, it should be time to move on. moreover there is a > > couple of bugfixes in texlive-core that have not been backported. > > > > (hopefully complete) partial list: > > app-text/texlive-2011 > > dev-texlive/*2011* > > app-text/texlive-core-2011-r5 > > >=app-text/ps2pkm-1.5_p20110705 > > >=app-text/dvipsk-5.991_p20110705 > > >=dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20110705 > > >=dev-libs/ptexenc-1.2.0_p20110705 > > Maybe we've been spoiled over the years, but compared to > > https://393007.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=296671 > https://394393.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=295865 > > the above list is useless, a lot of work done individually by everyone who > wants to test or mark these packages. Maybe you should be using the automation > tools they're using and publish a full list of targets. if you know where the tool is and how to use it i'd be very glad if you could provide such a list, thanks
Created attachment 296791 [details] List v.1 @Alexis, please check if is ok
(In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 296791 [details] > List v.1 > > @Alexis, please check if is ok yep, this should be good (i assumed deptree is sane), thanks!
Created attachment 297073 [details] List v.2
(In reply to comment #2) > > https://393007.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=296671 > > https://394393.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=295865 > if you know where the tool is and how to use it i'd be very glad if you could provide such a list, thanks Well, gnome@ and x11@ seem to have them. :) Meanwhile, sys-apps/portage these days does a proper job of telling users what to unmask, so I went with a (probably incomplete) list of that output. I'll now cross-reference that with Ago's and see what I am missing.
Stable for HPPA.
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > (In reply to comment #0) > > > time has passed, now that the regressions have hopefully been spotted and the > > > spotted ones have been fixed, it should be time to move on. moreover there is a > > > couple of bugfixes in texlive-core that have not been backported. > > > > > > (hopefully complete) partial list: > > > app-text/texlive-2011 > > > dev-texlive/*2011* > > > app-text/texlive-core-2011-r5 > > > >=app-text/ps2pkm-1.5_p20110705 > > > >=app-text/dvipsk-5.991_p20110705 > > > >=dev-tex/bibtexu-3.71_p20110705 > > > >=dev-libs/ptexenc-1.2.0_p20110705 > > > > Maybe we've been spoiled over the years, but compared to > > > > https://393007.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=296671 > > https://394393.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=295865 > > > > the above list is useless, a lot of work done individually by everyone who > > wants to test or mark these packages. Maybe you should be using the automation > > tools they're using and publish a full list of targets. > > if you know where the tool is and how to use it i'd be very glad if you could > provide such a list, thanks I think you're looking for this tool: http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/gnome.git;a=blob;f=scripts/gen_archlist.py
amd64 stable
x86 stable
arm stable
ppc and ppc64 done
Stable on alpha.
ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable
