Is it OK to stabilize =media-libs/qimageblitz-0.0.6 ? If so, please CC arches and add STABLEREQ keyword. Stabilization of this package has been repoman-checked on the following arches: x86, amd64
Maintainer timeout. Arches go ahead.
(In reply to comment #1) > Maintainer timeout. Arches go ahead. Paweł, should we expect you to start doing this from now on? So maintainers have a week to reply to requests or risk being "side-stepped"? I don't think there should be any problems with this package, but I'm concerned about the procedure.
(In reply to comment #2) > should we expect you to start doing this from now on? So maintainers have a > week to reply to requests or risk being "side-stepped"? > > I don't think there should be any problems with this package, but I'm concerned > about the procedure. I'd prefer to keep the discussion off-bugzilla, there is a gentoo-dev thread about this. The package has spent 6 months in ~arch, with no bugs reported against it. And then we're going to apply all arch testing procedures anyway.
amd64 ok
x86 stable
amd64 stable
Lets do this complete. Not only x86 amd64. Arch teams, please stabilize =media-libs/qimageblitz-0.0.6. Target: alpha, amd64, hppa, ia64, ppc, ppc64, sparc, x86
Stable for HPPA.
alpha/ia64/sparc keywords dropped
ppc done
ppc64 stable, closing