Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 381569 - [version bump] app-backup/spideroak-bin-4.1.9850
Summary: [version bump] app-backup/spideroak-bin-4.1.9850
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Normal enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Naohiro Aota
URL: https://spideroak.com/release_notes
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-09-02 14:22 UTC by Dennis Schridde
Modified: 2011-09-29 19:35 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Dennis Schridde 2011-09-02 14:22:33 UTC
A new version was released. A simple mv is enough.

I just noticed that this version is a beta. I suggest adding _beta to PV and strip that again inside the ebuild when saving the distfile. Patch attached.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Dennis Schridde 2011-09-02 14:25:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> I just noticed that this version is a beta. I suggest adding _beta to PV and
> strip that again inside the ebuild when saving the distfile. Patch attached.
Thinking about it again: That patch is not necessary. The file will be saved as $P_$ARCH.deb, which works just as well. $PV is used nowhere else in the ebuild, so adding _beta makes no difference.
Comment 2 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-09-02 17:13:43 UTC
Please fix metadata.xml - just think that machines won't interpret the <description> tags to order around the <maintainer> tags.
Comment 3 Naohiro Aota gentoo-dev 2011-09-04 14:56:36 UTC
Version bumped. Thanks.

(In reply to comment #2)
> Please fix metadata.xml - just think that machines won't interpret the
> <description> tags to order around the <maintainer> tags.

hm, what to fix? Is <description> tag invalid?

I just followed this page http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/sunrise/wiki/ProxyMaintainer and I see skel.metadata.xml has this tag.
Comment 4 Dennis Schridde 2011-09-05 06:51:17 UTC
app-backup/spideroak-bin-4.1.9848 appears to be in portage, but that version number is missing the suggested _beta tag. (Upstream has not yet released the final 4.1 version.)
Comment 5 Naohiro Aota gentoo-dev 2011-09-05 08:14:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> app-backup/spideroak-bin-4.1.9848 appears to be in portage, but that version
> number is missing the suggested _beta tag. (Upstream has not yet released the
> final 4.1 version.)

OK, I was misunderstanding your comment. Added _beta tag.
Comment 6 Dennis Schridde 2011-09-17 11:02:07 UTC
Final 4.1 has been released as 9849 and was then bugfixed as 9850. mv is enough for the bump, confirming that it works here.

Is IN_PROGRESS still the correct status for this bug?
Comment 7 Naohiro Aota gentoo-dev 2011-09-29 19:24:31 UTC
I've kept this bug opened, because I'd like to hear from Jeroen. Anyway I've commited 9850 and dropped 9848, closing this bug.
Comment 8 Dennis Schridde 2011-09-29 19:35:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Anyway I've commited 9850 and dropped 9848, closing this bug.
Thanks!