Bug 380783 – =sys-auth/pam_mount-2.11 =sys-libs/libhx-3.11: please stabilize

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Raphael Marichez (Falco) (RETIRED) 2011-08-26 21:02:10 UTC]

Hi,

pam_mount-2.1 is more a year old now, and contains bug #329895 (and perhaps other)

I would suggest to stabilize one of the latest versions. I recently hit this bug two times (hopefully the second time, i didn't waste so much time than the first time! ;) )

cheers

[Comment 1 Matt Turner 2011-08-27 15:10:56 UTC]

I didn't realize that we had stable keywords for any version of pam_mount.

Please stabilize

=sys-libs/libhx-3.11
=sys-auth/pam_mount-2.11

[Comment 2 David Abbott (RETIRED) 2011-08-27 16:21:03 UTC]

Arch tested on x86, all good here ...

[Comment 3 David Abbott (RETIRED) 2011-08-27 16:21:14 UTC]

Created attachment 284799 [details]
pam_mount.report

[Comment 4 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-08-28 17:53:20 UTC]

amd64box ~ # qlist pam_mount | grep selinux
/etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/macros/pam_mount_macros.te
/etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/file_contexts/misc/pam_mount.fc

Is expected with USE="-selinux" ?

[Comment 5 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2011-08-30 11:53:46 UTC]

amd64:

ditto Ago;  emerges fine

[Comment 6 Matt Turner 2011-08-30 20:37:06 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> amd64box ~ # qlist pam_mount | grep selinux
> /etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/macros/pam_mount_macros.te
> /etc/selinux/strict/src/policy/file_contexts/misc/pam_mount.fc
> 
> Is expected with USE="-selinux" ?

It is not, I believe. Fixed, thanks for noticing.

[Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-08-30 23:27:44 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> It is not, I believe. Fixed, thanks for noticing.

Great, works now, amd64 ok

[Comment 8 Tony Vroon (RETIRED) 2011-08-31 08:24:40 UTC]

+  31 Aug 2011; Tony Vroon <[e-mail]> libhx-3.11.ebuild:
+  Marked stable as a dependency of sys-auth/pam_mount-2.11 based on arch
+  testing by Ian "idella" Delaney & Agostino "ago" Sarubbo in bug #380783 filed
+  by Raphael "Falco" Marichez.

+  31 Aug 2011; Tony Vroon <[e-mail]> pam_mount-2.11.ebuild:
+  Marked stable on AMD64 based on arch testing by Ian "idella" Delaney &
+  Agostino "ago" Sarubbo in bug #380783 filed by Raphael "Falco" Marichez.

[Comment 9 Sebastian 2011-08-31 23:03:59 UTC]

pam_mount-2.11 should depend on hxtools which is not even in the tree.

hxtools includes 'ofl'. 'ofl' is needed if you want to use a pam_mount configuration like this:

<logout wait="1000000" hup="0" term="1" kill="1" />

You'd need this configuration if processes are still running on the mounted file-system on unmount (happens when you run Gnome and pam_mount tries to umount your /home).

Should I open a new bug for this?

[Comment 10 Matt Turner 2011-08-31 23:20:05 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> pam_mount-2.11 should depend on hxtools which is not even in the tree.
> 
> hxtools includes 'ofl'. 'ofl' is needed if you want to use a pam_mount
> configuration like this:
> 
> <logout wait="1000000" hup="0" term="1" kill="1" />
> 
> You'd need this configuration if processes are still running on the mounted
> file-system on unmount (happens when you run Gnome and pam_mount tries to
> umount your /home).
> 
> Should I open a new bug for this?

I don't think it should be made a dependency, but rather something suggested in pkg_postinst.

I'll add it to the tree in any case.

[Comment 11 Matt Turner 2011-08-31 23:49:25 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> I'll add it to the tree in any case.

Added app-misc/ofl.

[Comment 12 Markus Meier 2011-09-04 13:50:15 UTC]

x86 stable, thanks David

[Comment 13 Hanno Böck 2011-10-06 14:33:41 UTC]

Concerning #385653 I'd advise to stop further stabilization of 2.11, wait some time and then stabilize 2.12.

[Comment 14 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2012-03-07 19:14:27 UTC]

ppc done; closing as last arch