Even though this version has only been in the tree for a few days, I kindly ask for stabilization as it has been purely bug fixes for awhile and there is a bug in the stable tree due to changing behavior from sys-apps/portage & app-admin/eselect (bug 378899) Keywords: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 m68k ppc ppc64 s390 sh sparc x86 *eix-0.22.11 (12 Aug 2011) 12 Aug 2011; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> -eix-0.22.7.ebuild, -eix-0.22.8.ebuild, -eix-0.22.9.ebuild, +eix-0.22.11.ebuild: version bump, misc bug fixes. Remove old intermediate versions
works for me amd64 ok
amd64 ok
amd64 done. Thanks Agostino and Tomas
Archtested x86 on 2 systems: Good to go
x86 stable, thanks JD
ppc stable
Stable for HPPA.
arm stable
alpha/ia64/m68k/s390/sh/sparc stable
Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable.
(In reply to comment #10) > Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for > amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable. + 06 Sep 2011; Tony Vroon <chainsaw@gentoo.org> +eix-0.22.11.ebuild: + Reintroduce last stable, it appears to have been accidentally deleted. This + is based on a report by Nikoli in bug #379603 and by J.D. Horelick on IRC.
(In reply to comment #10) > Why this version was removed today from portage tree? Now latest stable for > amd64 is 0.22.5, downgrading from 0.22.11 seems unreasonable. My mistake, apologies.
General displeasure that ppc64 took so long to get to this. I wonder if *any* ppc64 user would care if I dropped it in the nex stablereq. Only one way to find out, waiting 4+ months is not an option, IMO. + 06 Dec 2011; Jeremy Olexa <darkside@gentoo.org> eix-0.22.11.ebuild: + mark ppc64, bug 379603