Please mark grfcodec-5.1.1.ebuild stable.
amd64 ok
amd64: pass.
Builds fine on x86. Rdep builds fine. Please mark stable for x86.
amd64 done. Thanks Agostino and Elijah
I am having a problem here (amd64). # emerge -Du world These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ] games-util/catcodec-1.0.3 [1.0.0] 0 kB [ebuild U ] games-util/grfcodec-5.1.1 [0_pre2306] 0 kB [blocks B ] games-util/nforenum ("games-util/nforenum" is blocking games-util/grfcodec-5.1.1) Total: 2 packages (2 upgrades), Size of downloads: 0 kB Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (games-util/nforenum-0_pre2309::gentoo, installed) pulled in by games-util/nforenum required by (games-misc/opengfx-0.2.4::gentoo, installed) (games-util/grfcodec-5.1.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by games-util/grfcodec required by (games-misc/opengfx-0.2.4::gentoo, installed) For more information about Blocked Packages, please refer to the following section of the Gentoo Linux x86 Handbook (architecture is irrelevant): http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?full=1#blocked Sure enough, from /usr/portage/games-misc/opengfx/opengfx-0.2.4.ebuild: DEPEND="games-util/nforenum games-util/grfcodec" But from /usr/portage/games-util/grfcodec/grfcodec-5.1.1.ebuild: DEPEND="!games-util/nforenum dev-lang/perl dev-libs/boost media-libs/libpng" Brilliant!
x86 stable, thanks Myckel
This bug depends on bug 375681. See bug 365961 for details.
If I may ask a stupid (but obvious) question, why is this getting stablilized without games-misc/opengfx-0.3.3, when bug 375681 supposed blocks that from happening?
(In reply to comment #8) > If I may ask a stupid (but obvious) question, why is this getting stablilized > without games-misc/opengfx-0.3.3, when bug 375681 supposed blocks that from > happening? Because the opener decided to file this STABLEREQ without first checking bug 365961 (which would have made obvious this block) and the arch testers didn't have openttd installed? I filed the STABLEREQ bug 375681 and added the block only some 12 hours ago when I noticed this, but by then x86 and amd64 stabilisation already took place.
(In reply to comment #9) See also bug 365957
ppc/ppc64 stable, last arch closing