Bug 364523 – net-misc/gsasl-1.6.1 Please stabilize

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description William Throwe 2011-04-22 21:46:33 UTC]

Current stable is 0.2.4, which was added to portage in January 2005.  There have been many bugfixes since then.

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Eray Aslan 2011-06-08 14:46:40 UTC]

Arches, please test and mark stable =net-misc/gsasl-1.6.1

[Comment 2 Ian Delaney (RETIRED) 2011-06-08 14:57:09 UTC]

amd64:


amd64 all ok

[Comment 3 Agostino Sarubbo 2011-06-09 08:48:42 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> amd64:
> 
> 
> amd64 all ok

+1

[Comment 4 Andreas Schürch 2011-06-17 11:40:40 UTC]

I tested it on x86, but with use=gcrypt i canceled the testsuite at gsasl_nonce after a bit more than 24 hours.


Entry 23 server mechanism SECURID:
Input : YXV0aHppZABhdXRoaWQANDcxMQA=
Output: cGFzc2NvZGU=                
Input : YXV0aHppZABhdXRoaWQANDcxMQA=
Output:                             
PASS: simple SECURID server 23      

Self test `./simple' finished with 0 errors
PASS: simple                               
gsasl_nonce                                
^C                                         

Exiting on signal 2

!!! select error: (4, 'Interrupted system call')
sandbox:stop  caught signal 2 in pid 525        
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Interrupt            
make[1]: *** [check-am] Interrupt               
sandbox:stop  signal already caught and busy still cleaning up!
make: *** [check-recursive] Interrupt                          

/usr/portage/net-misc/gsasl/gsasl-1.6.1.ebuild: dyn_test aborted; exiting.

[Comment 5 Eray Aslan 2011-06-17 13:58:08 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> I tested it on x86, but with use=gcrypt i canceled the testsuite at gsasl_nonce after a bit more than 24 hours.

Can you be running low on entropy?  gsasl_nonce just initializes a 10 byte buffer with STRONG_RANDOM data using libgcrypt.

Try to repeat the test with a high-entropy-computer please.  If it is still a problem, please attach your build log and emerge --info to bug #331707 and we will take it from there.  Thanks.

[Comment 6 Andreas Schürch 2011-06-17 15:55:33 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)

> Can you be running low on entropy? 

Yep, that was the case! Thanks!
I like KVM's VNC support! :-) 

Everything fine here now on x86!

[Comment 7 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) 2011-06-18 20:31:31 UTC]

amd64 done. Thanks Agostino and Ian

[Comment 8 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2011-06-22 21:21:01 UTC]

ppc done

[Comment 9 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) 2011-06-24 15:20:08 UTC]

ia64/sparc keywords dropped, we're happy with net-libs/libgsasl

[Comment 10 David Abbott (RETIRED) 2011-07-15 18:42:41 UTC]

Arch tested on x86, all good here ...

[Comment 11 Markus Meier 2011-07-19 19:46:34 UTC]

x86 stable, thanks Andreas and David