First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug
Bug#: 36452
Alias:
Product:
Component:
Status: RESOLVED
Resolution: FIXED
Assigned To: Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) <seemant@gentoo.org>
Hardware:
OS:
Version:
Priority:
Severity:
Reporter: Torsten Veller <tove@gentoo.org>
Add CC:
CC:
Remove selected CCs
URL:
Summary:
Status Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Filename Description Type Creator Created Size Actions
bogofilter-0.15.12.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.12.ebuild text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-24 17:10 0000 2.10 KB Details
bogofilter-0.15.12-r1.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.12.ebuild text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-25 09:56 0000 2.16 KB Details
rstats.diff rstats.c patch patch Torsten Veller 2003-12-25 09:56 0000 381 bytes Details | Diff
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - uses tdb and doc text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-26 09:51 0000 2.03 KB Details
bogofilter-0.15.13-r1.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - no local use flag - only db database text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-26 09:51 0000 1.77 KB Details
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - uses tdb and doc text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-27 16:27 0000 2.05 KB Details
bogofilter-0.15.13-r1.ebuild bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - no local use flag - only db database text/plain Torsten Veller 2003-12-27 16:28 0000 1.71 KB Details
Create a New Attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.) View All

Bug 36452 depends on: Show dependency tree
Bug 36452 blocks:
Votes: 0    Show votes for this bug    Vote for this bug

Additional Comments: (this is where you put emerge --info)


Not eligible to see or edit group visibility for this bug.






View Bug Activity   |   Format For Printing   |   XML   |   Clone This Bug


Description:   Opened: 2003-12-24 17:09 0000
see bug #35430.
@net-mail herd: should i stop sending these ebuilds?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:

------- Comment #1 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-24 17:10:06 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22645) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.12.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-25 09:56:15 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22659) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.12.ebuild

update (memory leak -- additional patch needed)

------- Comment #3 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-25 09:56:58 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22660) [edit]
rstats.c patch

------- Comment #4 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-26 09:51:04 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22673) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - uses tdb and doc

------- Comment #5 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-26 09:51:56 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22674) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - no local use flag - only db database

------- Comment #6 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-27 16:27:42 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22722) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - uses tdb and doc

added some ideas from seemant's commit.

------- Comment #7 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-27 16:28:28 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=22723) [edit]
bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild - no local use flag - only db database

------- Comment #8 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-28 03:51:30 0000 -------
(From update of attachment 22723 [edit])
IUSE="" must be added

------- Comment #9 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2003-12-28 19:17:31 0000 -------
*** Bug 35430 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #10 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2003-12-28 19:18:41 0000 -------
tove, I'd like to commit this ebuild to portage -- the only thing is the one
comment in the postinst section about the 0.14 versions.  Are there any
expanded comments we need to make about the 0.15 versions instead?

------- Comment #11 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-29 01:56:26 0000 -------
Some comments:
1) "With version 0..."
   I remember that i put this in as "With version 0.11..." because the command line flags -S, -N were change (see RELEASE-NOTES-0.11). I don't know who has changed it to 0.14, but i see that you changed it to 0.15. This makes me think that my old statement was not obvious enough.
So i think we can drop the three lines following "With version...." nowadays.

Maybe it is good to add a 'Otherwise':
ewarn "Otherwise please read specifically about the new -H option"
(Because -H is only for old worldlists.)

2) You put "docinto programmer ; dodoc doc/programmer/*" into your ebuild.
  I think we should remove it again (only other OS stuff). If not...
2a) In my bogofilter-0.15.13.ebuild it must be moved to the end because of "docinto" and
2b) subdirectorys are lost (programmer/RISC-OS/....

------- Comment #12 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2003-12-29 02:12:57 0000 -------
thanks tove, added to portage.

------- Comment #13 From Torsten Veller 2003-12-29 08:15:51 0000 -------
IUSE="" is missing (#8)
# $Header:  is empty (strange)


------- Comment #14 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2003-12-29 12:20:01 0000 -------
fixed.

------- Comment #15 From Torsten Veller 2004-01-07 04:02:04 0000 -------
A fixed bogofilter version is out. Excerpt from Announcement:

------
Bogofilter-0.15.13.1 has been released to fix minor, yet annoying,
portability and packaging bugs that have been reported against
Bogofilter-0.15.13 in the past few days.

It has no new features and does not change function in any way, except
0.15.13.1 may work on systems where 0.15.13 did not.

> If bogofilter 0.15.13 compiles and works for you, you do not need to update. <                                        
Bogofilter 0.15.13.1 is available on SourceForge.  The download URL is
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=62265&release_id=208191

The list of changes over 0.15.13 is quite short:

 1. a bogus empty line in the src/ Makefiles was removed, to allow for
    compilation with non-GNU make commands.

 2. a setvbuf() portability problem was fixed, not all platforms support
    setvbuf(f, NULL, _IOLBF, 0) - the 0 was replaced by BUFSIZ (ANSI-C).

 3. The binary RPMs now have GSL statically linked, to fix problems as
    "relocation error: bogofilter: undefined symbol: gsl_cdf_chisq_Q"
_____


Only renaming of the ebuild is necessary: bogofilter-0.15.13.1.ebuild (i tested on x86) 

Maybe you want to take the line
docinto programmer ; dodoc doc/programmer/*
out.

------- Comment #16 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2004-01-07 11:31:03 0000 -------
thanks tove

------- Comment #17 From Torsten Veller 2004-02-10 08:18:27 0000 -------
xmlto:
 xmlto-0.0.15.ebuild:KEYWORDS="x86 ~ppc sparc alpha ia64 hppa"                          
 xmlto-0.0.17.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~x86 ppc ~sparc ~alpha ~ia64 ~amd64"

so bogofilter should not contain "~ppc64 ~mips"

Thx.

------- Comment #18 From Torsten Veller 2004-02-10 08:27:01 0000 -------
could you please remove "docinto programmer ; dodoc doc/programmer/*" (see
comment #11.2)

or

is there any reason that i don't know to install it? Then it would be great if
you let me know.

------- Comment #19 From Brandon Low (RETIRED) 2004-02-10 08:32:13 0000 -------
I'm about to commit this keywords change and some other changes (37017) as well
as 2 new versions of bogofilter.

------- Comment #20 From Brandon Low (RETIRED) 2004-02-10 08:35:58 0000 -------
Wait, UGH... maybe I need to just remove that and use has_version... comments
seemant?

------- Comment #21 From Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) 2004-02-10 10:40:55 0000 -------
what has_version?

------- Comment #22 From Brandon Low (RETIRED) 2004-02-10 10:50:06 0000 -------
Never mind that... see CVS bogofilter versions, they should be fine for all
arches now, pass repoman on my end at least...

First Last Prev Next    No search results available      Search page      Enter new bug