Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 354241 - x11-libs/gtksourceview:1.0 and reverse-dependencies removal request
Summary: x11-libs/gtksourceview:1.0 and reverse-dependencies removal request
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard: Pending Removal: 2011-07-29
Keywords: PMASKED
Depends on: 310971 314059 355049 357573 361887 361889
Blocks: 252528 352952 354929
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2011-02-09 14:34 UTC by Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED)
Modified: 2011-09-13 11:55 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-02-09 14:34:22 UTC
Hi guys,

since this library is getting old and most users are unmaintained anyway, shall we proceed to its removal from the tree ?

For the record, I propose removal of:

app-editors/amyedit
app-editors/conglomerate
app-editors/mlview
app-editors/screem
dev-embedded/gnusim8085
dev-python/gtksourceview-python
dev-ruby/ruby-gtksourceview
gnome-extra/libgnomedb:1 and :3
net-misc/drivel
sci-electronics/oregano

games-strategy/ufo-ai
sci-mathematics/genius
sci-mathematics/gretl

after checking they are indeed locked to slot 1 and have no slot 2 version available
Comment 1 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-02-09 17:08:06 UTC
I agree with their removal
Comment 2 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-02-13 14:49:22 UTC
CCing maintainers of some of affected packages

(In reply to comment #0)
> dev-embedded/gnusim8085

This doesn't need to be dropped if it's bumped

(In reply to comment #0)
> dev-python/gtksourceview-python

This cannot be dropped as it's needed by app-accessibility/accerciser, this also blocks removal of x11-libs/gtksourceview:1.0 :'(
Comment 3 Rafael Martins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-02-13 15:28:47 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> sci-electronics/oregano

Oregano actually needs some care. Apparently Ubuntu packages are using gtksourceview:2.0. I'll take a look at this when I have some free time.

Regards.

Comment 4 Hans de Graaff gentoo-dev Security 2011-02-13 18:13:55 UTC
> dev-ruby/ruby-gtksourceview

These bindings have no reverse dependencies, feel free to mask/remove then together with gtksourceview:0 itself.
Comment 5 Tim Harder gentoo-dev 2011-02-13 22:15:29 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> CCing maintainers of some of affected packages
> 
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > dev-embedded/gnusim8085

I bumped gnusim8085. Either 1.3.5 or 1.3.6 should be stabilized on x86 before removing the versions that depend on gtksourceview:1.0 from the tree.
Comment 6 Rafael Martins (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-02-14 02:03:51 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > sci-electronics/oregano
> 
> Oregano actually needs some care. Apparently Ubuntu packages are using
> gtksourceview:2.0. I'll take a look at this when I have some free time.
> 

sci-electronics/oregano-0.69.1 is on the tree and uses x11-libs/gtksourceview:2.0.

Comment 7 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-02-14 09:53:46 UTC
Thanks for your help :-)
Comment 8 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2011-02-14 18:30:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> app-editors/amyedit

converted to :2 with 1.0-r2, with the gtksouceviewmm bindings. Feel free to file a stable request bug after 30 days
Comment 9 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-02-14 19:49:41 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> This cannot be dropped as it's needed by app-accessibility/accerciser, this
> also blocks removal of x11-libs/gtksourceview:1.0 :'(
> 

RDEPEND was wrong, it really needs pygtksourceview instead
Comment 10 Rafał Mużyło 2011-02-15 13:33:41 UTC
In case of removal, dev-vcs/git will need a dep cleanup.
Comment 11 Thomas Beierlein gentoo-dev 2011-08-02 16:27:36 UTC
Removed old version depending on gtksourceview:1 from tree and pm.

+  02 Aug 2011; Thomas Beierlein <tomjbe@gentoo.org>
+  -files/oregano-0.60.0-dont-run-update-mime-database.patch,
+  -oregano-0.69.0.ebuild, -oregano-0.69.0-r1.ebuild,
+  -files/oregano-0.69.0-ldflags.diff:
+  remove oregano-0.69.0 (pending 22 Jul 2011), see #354241 for reference
Comment 12 Michael Weber (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-08-05 01:44:04 UTC
+*mlview-0.9.0-r1 (05 Aug 2011)
+
+  05 Aug 2011; Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> +mlview-0.9.0-r1.ebuild,
+  +files/mlview-0.9.0-r1-10_port_to_gtksourceview2.patch,
+  +files/mlview-0.9.0-r1-autoreconf.patch, metadata.xml:
+  Taking maint, revbump with port to gtksourceview:2.0
+

I've dropped the stable keywords in this revbump (as usual).
An upcomming removal of the old revision would remove all stable versions.

Should the new revbump be fast-stable'd?
Comment 13 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2011-08-05 09:12:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #12)
> +*mlview-0.9.0-r1 (05 Aug 2011)
> +
> +  05 Aug 2011; Michael Weber <xmw@gentoo.org> +mlview-0.9.0-r1.ebuild,
> +  +files/mlview-0.9.0-r1-10_port_to_gtksourceview2.patch,
> +  +files/mlview-0.9.0-r1-autoreconf.patch, metadata.xml:
> +  Taking maint, revbump with port to gtksourceview:2.0
> +
> 
> I've dropped the stable keywords in this revbump (as usual).
> An upcomming removal of the old revision would remove all stable versions.
> 
> Should the new revbump be fast-stable'd?

I don't think it's necessary, the package has had no activity for so long it can probably wait one or two weeks more :)
Comment 14 Pacho Ramos gentoo-dev 2011-09-13 11:55:59 UTC
Dropped