Bug 350935 – net-fs/openafs-1.4.14 version bump

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 08:56:13 UTC]

openafs 1.4.14 was released on 6.1.2011. It fixes the compile issues with 2.6.36 and 2.6.37 kernels.

[Comment 1 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 10:05:37 UTC]

Created attachment 259119 [details]
openafs-1.4.14 ebuild

copy of openafs-1.4.12.1-r2.ebuild except for patch version 3

[Comment 2 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 10:07:26 UTC]

Created attachment 259120 [details]
openafs-kernel.1.4.14 ebuild

copy of openafs-kernel-1.4.12.1.ebuild with patch version 3

[Comment 3 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 10:11:22 UTC]

Created attachment 259121 [details]
patches

created from openafs-1.4.12.1-patches-2.tar.bz2, 012_all_kbuild.patch removed

[Comment 4 SpanKY 2011-01-07 22:50:59 UTC]

Comment on attachment 259121 [details]
patches

this patch tarball has more differences from the CVS tree than one patch missing ...

http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/src/patchsets/openafs/patches/1.4/

[Comment 5 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 23:08:12 UTC]

I took this file as the base:
http://distfiles.gentoo.org/distfiles/openafs-1.4.12.1-patches-2.tar.bz2
not sure how this is generated from cvs. In any case, kbuild patch can be removed.

[Comment 6 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 23:22:28 UTC]

Oh, I see. It is done with make-tarball.sh. Then I guess it would be more consistent not to change the patches at all in cvs, but rather use the following in both ebuilds.
        EPATCH_EXCLUDE="012_all_kbuild.patch" \
        EPATCH_SUFFIX="patch" \
        epatch "${WORKDIR}"/gentoo/patches
as in net-fs/openafs-1.4.12.1-r2.ebuild

[Comment 7 SpanKY 2011-01-07 23:36:56 UTC]

so all of the new patches are fine for 1.4.14 ?

[Comment 8 Andrej Filipcic 2011-01-07 23:44:42 UTC]

Exactly. Please, ignore my patches tarball.

[Comment 9 SpanKY 2011-01-08 02:07:34 UTC]

ok, ive version bumped both