Bugzilla Bug 34973

qpkg -f /usr/bin/muse 
media-sound/muse *
media-sound/museseq *

Guess that's not the way it should be ;-)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge muse
2. emerge museseq
3. qpkg -f /usr/bin/muse

Talking to some #gentoo-people and thinking about a possible solution I guess
the museseq-maintainer should name "his" binary just like that.
Since he already added the "seq" suffix to the package name it should be quite
intuitive to provide a program with the same name.

another option is "lmuse" - that's the page name on sourceforge...

This is the way i can resolve it in my system, but maybe it isn't the best
solution :

#ebuild /usr/portage/media-sound/museseq/museseq-0.6.2.ebuild fetch unpack
compile install
#cd /var/tmp/portage/museseq-0.6.2/image/usr/bin/
#mv muse lmuse
#ebuild /usr/portage/media-sound/museseq/museseq-0.6.2.ebuild qmerge
#emerge muse

This way you can use museseq and muse in the same system and portage knows that
museseq is called now lmuse (good for unmerging)

//Sorry about my english,  feel free to correct it

Created an attachment (id=25761) [edit]
ebuild-patch: changes muse to lmuse & adds einfo

i just incorporated that solution into the ebuild-file. you have to add the
lines
  cd ${D}
  mv usr/bin/muse usr/bin/lmuse
at the end of the "src-install()"-part of the ebuild. the applied patch does
that.

a few open questions:
 o is it nice to change binary-names of packages?
 o shouldn't the beuild be called "lmuse" instead of "museseq"?
 o did anybody contact the author of this package?

in portage...