Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 341933 - dev-tex/luatex-0.63.0 stable request (was: dev-tex/luatex-0.50.0-r1 fails to build with autoconf-2.68)
Summary: dev-tex/luatex-0.63.0 stable request (was: dev-tex/luatex-0.50.0-r1 fails to ...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: AMD64 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: TeX project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks: autoconf-2.66
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2010-10-20 20:07 UTC by Christian D.
Modified: 2010-11-27 17:51 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Build Log (luatex.log,117.85 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-20 20:10 UTC, Christian D.
Details
emerge --info luatex (luatex.emerge.info,4.67 KB, text/plain)
2010-10-20 20:10 UTC, Christian D.
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christian D. 2010-10-20 20:07:17 UTC
As the title says dev-tex/luatex-0.50.0-r1 fails to build on amd64. 

The package was installed but needed to be rebuilt due to broken links



Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerge luatex




The current testing version (0.63.0) builds just fine but gentoo should provide a robust foundation for tex(live) also in the stable branch
Comment 1 Christian D. 2010-10-20 20:10:23 UTC
Created attachment 251363 [details]
Build Log
Comment 2 Christian D. 2010-10-20 20:10:53 UTC
Created attachment 251365 [details]
emerge --info luatex
Comment 3 pavel sanda 2010-10-22 11:08:11 UTC
the same on x86
Comment 4 pavel sanda 2010-10-22 14:07:59 UTC
i found that downgrading autoconf to stable version makes emerge proceed (2.65-r1)
Comment 5 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2010-10-23 12:56:01 UTC
guess it's simpler to stabilise a newer version then; it's been there for almost one month already.
Comment 6 Alexis Ballier gentoo-dev 2010-10-23 12:57:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> guess it's simpler to stabilise a newer version then; it's been there for
> almost one month already.
> 

Comment 7 Agostino Sarubbo gentoo-dev 2010-10-23 14:00:20 UTC
ok for me on amd64.

(*) There is:

QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile fine but exhibit random runtime failures.
 * luatexdir/luafontloader/fontforge/fontforge/nouiutil.c:49: warning: attempt to free a non-heap object 'buffer'

is an error known/repairable?

Is the case to open a bug on?
Comment 8 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-23 16:42:00 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 9 David Abbott (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-24 01:09:53 UTC
Archtested on x86: Everything fine
Comment 10 Markos Chandras (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-25 22:57:36 UTC
amd64 done. Thanks Agostino
Comment 11 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-26 08:48:53 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 12 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-26 09:16:46 UTC
Stable for PPC.
Comment 13 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-10-26 14:55:58 UTC
stable x86, thanks David
Comment 14 Markus Meier gentoo-dev 2010-10-29 15:02:15 UTC
arm stable
Comment 15 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2010-11-27 17:51:58 UTC
alpha/ia64/s390/sh/sparc stable, closing